The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,868
    34,855
    Jun 23, 2005
    Exactly my point but it flew right over his head.:-(
     
  2. HMSTempleGarden

    HMSTempleGarden Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,686
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    and one fighter is going to be ****ing stupid to use a drug that stays in your system for months!!! :patsch
     
  3. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    It's hard to say USADA is better based on the 3 most recent fights that each organization were involved in. WADA is considered the Gold standard but that because they pioneered drug testing for the Olympics. But that doesn't mean VADA couldn't have improved on an out dated process. WADA never really had any competition....there haven't been improvements in their process because there wasn't any reason to do so since they had a strangle hold on the market....with VADA in the mix WADA will be forced to make improvements.
     
  4. meh...

    meh... New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    May 29, 2012
    WADA and thus USADA does CIR, I am not denying this, anyone that does is a fool. They only do it form the onset of testng if it is for a specific testing case and is stipulated in the said testing case's contract, or if they choose a case selectively randomly (10% of cases for all sports), otherwise they only do CIR when the 4:1 ratio has been breached first, allowing for micorodosing (i.e. stayiing below 4:1 ratio, say 3.77:1 like Lamont). VADA does CIR from onset for ALL cases, regardles of T/E ratio.
     
  5. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    It didn't fly over their head, they want to argue like you said.. There is no logic or anything to it, anything or anyone for Floyd will be argued against. Anyone against Floyd or his fans will be argued for. It's tired. :tired Only reason I take time out to post is because new fans who come here read this **** and get a false reality because of them. Then they come on and say Floyd fans are ruining boxing.
     
  6. HMSTempleGarden

    HMSTempleGarden Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,686
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    aye so it was, if it was your point you should have come and just said it, instead you needed another Floyd **** Smoker to back you up!!
     
  7. JN43

    JN43 Guest

    BOOM this right here!
    this is why vada is better no one can deny it.
     
  8. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Did you not just read the last part saying ALL of the samples from the Cotto Mayweather fight were tested.. Do you believe ALL of the samples from BOTH fighters were at or above 4:1 ratio? **** off troll.
     
  9. JN43

    JN43 Guest

    so much ****ing butthurt
    bbuuu tttt fllooooydd is nevvvver wronnnggg wah
     
  10. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Kindly eat a big bag of ****. I come on here and correct you and you fly off with names on a poster you know nothing about because he didn't agree with you.
     
  11. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011
    WADA VADA BULL****!!!

    Lol sorry.. I couldn't resist after continously reading WADA and VADA and USADA etc...

    And I believe that doping would be covered up.

    If Haye and Chisora can create uproar over a little scuffle, imagine what PBF or Manny Pacquiao being caught would do?
     
  12. meh...

    meh... New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    May 29, 2012
    The cotto/may was one testing case, i'm not saying they only did cir on one of their samples, they did it for all their samples - but it was one case overall. 90% of the time for cases, unless 4:1 is breached, USADA won't do CIR from the onset of testing (I'm talking for all sport here). ONe case can have mutiple samples to be tested.
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Because some of us are more interested in the truth. And with that, comes difficult questions. Are you even aware of what many of us are asking about this situation? Or are you just assumig we're bashing floyd and calling him a cheat?

    Because I have NOT bashed him on any of this, nor have I even suggested he's cheating. Argiing with Floyd fanboys does NOT equal hating floyd.

    But on the other side, your side, you have postes just talking **** about Montoya, just because something possibly points to Mayweather. It's called shooting the messenger in case you didn't know.

    I am more curious to see how this pans out when MORE information is uncovered. Aren't you? Or are you one who wants Montoya to stop all he's doing as well?
     
  14. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    VADA has a stricter method in testing USADA does not, again you would want the best available testing wouldnt you? regardless of the brand name USADA has made for themselves over the years if they are not getting the job done right its time to look for a better place to test.

    Think about it How many US Olympians have used steroids been tested by the USADA and passed only to come out later on and admit they were juicing?

    USADA has fallen behind, its time we use a more reliable up to date company who is willing to look for drugs.
     
  15. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    They don't even test the freaking samples. They are the pimps that reap the benefits. The collect the samples, send them to a lab, and then write up reports based on someone else's work.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.