The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Interesting. If they fight under the Nevada commission that will be the ultimate authority. If someone fails a WADA test for something that isn't banned by Nevada what would be the fallout? I'd be surprised if the lists varied by much.

 

If Gaybriel wasn't so anti-floyd, why didn't he attend mayweather-cotto? Arguably biggest fight of the year, oh yeah, you know why, because floyd is a bad little man and gaybriel was in protest :rofl atsch. He runs a boxing site, shouldn't he errrr let's say cover boxing? :yep

 

Nevada refused Peterson a license based on the USADA results didn't they?

 

The flaws we refuse to see in ourselves are usually the first flaw we see in others. I'm sure we are all hypocrites at the end of the day.

 

The moment these guys agree to the testing the very first moment they are approached by a member of the clinic they usually have to sign paper work in order to verify that the test were conducted before them etc..

At that time they are given a list of whats banned and what they will be testing for. if they are not given a list, its their responsibility to obtain a copy of that list.

Regardless if the list is different than that of the commission both must be followed, because the moment you agree to working with an outfit such as USADA or VADA or WADA, you commit to their rules, and the moment you hold a license to box you commit to the rules of the commission.

So this whole their list may be different, thats irrelevant as you have committed to an outside testing agency for additional testing for that specific fight, while at the same time you have rules that are set forth by the commission as well.

I just think your trying to poke holes here to find something so that you may discredit how things are being done.

 

You do not understand what I am saying read my last post.... above this one

 

I don't have to poke any holes. You're accusing them of wrong doing. You're doing so without any proof. That's fine, but you need to realize that you're just guessing here. No one has to prove that they're innocent.

 

He's too ****ing dense to see that and thats what makes him a hypocrit...Hell, pretty much all boxers have done somethng file things outside of the ring...thats why its best to leave the personal **** were it belongs. When people start venturing off into fighters personal lives...its only opens up for more criticism. In which he clearly has done in this matter...He harps on Mayweather for beating women but turn around and support a man who's murded a women.atsch

 

I am not doing anything, I am simply stating that Montoya has a pretty good record so far at exposing cheats, there are good odds on his story right now. if your a betting man you understand this.

 

It was actually VADA and Dr Margaret Goodman was the head physician on their board for some time. Aside from that, they did it because they wanted to, not because they had too. Example: if WADA has xylocaine on the banned list and the fighter gets caught, yet it's not on Nevada's list, Nevada will not suspend said fighter. It's their discretion.

 

But But maybe that ***** had it coming? yes that man killed his wife, still does not make it okay for Floyd beating up his babys momma in front of his kids threatening to kill her in front of his kids, then turning on his kids and threatening them which lead them to have to run for their saftey.

 

I'm not trying to poke holes, I'm disagreeing with you point blank. See my post above this one for real world example that you are wrong.

 

So Montoya is claiming that The USADA opted out of doing testing for the Wright/Quillen fight because of some sort of cheating that is going on?

 

You find one post of mines condoming that ****...You're not about to use somebody else arguement on me!:-(

If you gonna do that ****...Be consistant!

The **** are even trying to argue anyways?

 

eeeeerrrrrr.... its clearly more effective?? maybe???