May-Pac contract from 2010 (per Yahoo Sports)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PBFred, Jun 1, 2012.

  1. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    no, no, no....:nono

    Published: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 6:55 PM
    Updated: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 10:09 PM

    http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/index.ssf/2009/12/floyd_mayweather_representativ.html

    In a highly unconventional move, representatives of Floyd Mayweather are demanding that both their fighter and Manny Pacquiao be subjected to random, Olympic-style drug testing in the weeks leading up to their proposed March 13 fight.

    Leonard Ellerbe, Mayweather’s adviser, declined to comment whether the demand was based on suspicions, initially voiced by Floyd Mayweather Sr., and subsequently by others close to Mayweather, that Pacquiao uses performance-enhancing drugs.

    “I’m not going to get into that,” Ellerbe said. “But people can read between the lines. Al and I made sure this will be implemented. It is going to be done.”

    Ellerbe stressed that
    This content is protected
    ........
     
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    51,943
    Likes Received:
    2
    Go call Pac and ask him. :roll:

    Anyway, it's quite simple, they didn't trust DLH to make weight. With Pac coming up from ONE fight at 135, and DLH going down, they wanted some insurance that DLH wouldn't pull a fast one. Fight THIS huge not happening due to a weight not being made puts a lot of pressure on the other fighter to continue on. See how that worked for Corrales vs. Castillo II?

    Nothing more then assurance. But by all means, make some big deal about that. Precedent? Drama queen...
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,571
    Likes Received:
    3,764
    Not making a big deal, that would be Team Pac making such a big deal out of it.

    it's pretty simple actually. One wanted a weight cheating clause and one wanted a steroid cheating clause.

    One accepted, one didn't.
     
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    19,438
    Likes Received:
    24
    The fact that your talkin about **** from 2010 show you have 0 argument.
     
  5. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    the "OSDT" was never and has never been reported as part of the original contract brought over by arum to pac in manila on dec. 4, 2009.
     
  6. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,623
    Likes Received:
    1
    And the point your trying to make is what exactly? Because regardless it is in the contract, so its either take it or leave it. And well TR & Pac chose to leave it.
     
  7. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    20,570
    Likes Received:
    19
    lmao....this is more of an indictment of Mayweather than it is Pacquiao. So Floyd was OK with a 50/50 split back when Pac was less of a consistent Pay Per View player, and yet now he won't even let him touch PPV? **** sakes.
     
  8. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,623
    Likes Received:
    1
    This content is protected


    What you complaining about? It never stopped you.
     
  9. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,121
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Pacquiao's stipulations seem to be very normal compared to other stipulations made by highly regarded, #1 ranked fighters. What did Pacquiao stipulate?, more money?. He sure as hell didn't try to implement new rules for this one fight, did he?

    There's a major difference between demanding more money or even a specific location for a fight than demanding new rules. Back then it was Mayweather's first time announcing this new rule just when Pacquiao was in line of negotiations. Why wasn't it requested for Marquez?. Far too many questions kicked in when it was first requested and a lot of laughter as well. That specific demand didn't exactly settle in as it did now nor was it accepted by the public so the reaction back then was clearly different than it is today. Which is why Pacquiao accepts the drug testing now yet demands more money in return, which is also understandable considering Pacquiao is the active fighter.
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,121
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    No it wasn't. As negotiations were underway and almost done for a fight in March, the coast was clear and there was no room for speculation of any sort till Mayweather randomly brought that up.

    The mind games played by Mayweather here were clear. He knew that if he brought this up Pacquiao's team, whom already agreed to all demands including the 50/50 split, would immediately question it and back off from it. That type of reaction would raise two types of people, those that will question if Pacquiao is cheating and those that will laugh at this demand and wonder why it wasn't requested for Marquez. Obviously Mayweather played it well and here we are today.

    Fact is, Arum, as all promoters, would rather save Pacquiao for someone in his stable to keep his business rolling IF Pacquiao loses. That's what all promoters do. Mayweather didn't exactly corner them to make a fight properly like Williams did to Margarito back in the day. That's exactly what Arum wants and Mayweather is making it easy for him. So both are to be blamed though Mayweather easily takes most of the blame.
     
  11. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    http://www.boxinginsider.com/headlines/scoop-malinowski-pac-floyd-was-killed-in-2009/

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    George Peterson on Dec. 2, 2009. Photo by Scoop Malinowski


    BoxingInsider: Who do you see winning Pacquiao vs. Floyd?
    Peterson: “It’s not gonna happen.”

    BoxingInsider: You don’t think so?
    Peterson: “No.”

    BoxingInsider: Why not?
    Peterson: “It’s not a fight that’s meant to be made. That fight’s just not meant to be made.”

    BoxingInsider: Why not? Everyone wants to see it?
    Peterson: “A lot of people want to see it but they’re not gonna see it.”

    BoxingInsider: Mayweather doesn’t want it does he?
    Peterson: “Ah, that fight is not gonna be made.”

    BoxingInsider: You’re saying it with a lot of certainty in your voice.
    Peterson: “Yes sir. Yes sir. If it was gonna be made it would be made by now.”

    BoxingInsider: Who doesn’t want to pull the trigger? (I know Mayweather is the chicken here, just want to try to get more from the source.)
    Peterson: “I just don’t see it being made.”

    BoxingInsider: You know something but won’t say it.
    Peterson: [Smiles]. :think

    BoxingInsider: Who would win, if it was made? Just for fun?
    Peterson: “It’s not gonna be made. That fight is not gonna be made.”

    BoxingInsider: I hear you, it’s not even worth wasting the energy on a fight that is fantasy.
    Peterson: “It’s not gonna happen.”

    (Keep in mind Peterson works closely with Floyd’s advisor Al Haymon in directing the career of Paul Williams.)
    ............
     
  12. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    22,560
    Likes Received:
    67
    The fight could have happened but Floyd didn't want it, so mentioned drug testing. Everything else was agreed upon. When Pacquiao accepts drug testing, Mayweather offers far less than what Pacquiao deserves. If Pacquiao accepts, Mayweather will move the goalposts again.

    Same old ducking ****.
     
  13. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,121
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Roach didn't exactly demand anything ridiculous. The fight was going to be at 147 which Mayweather can make. If he goes anywhere beyond that(which ruins the fight ANYWAY) the Pacquiao team would NOT let the public's high anticipation(possibly highest ever) turn into insane frustration but would want more money for it. How is that unfair in any way?, you can't make welterweight, sure we will still fight you but want more money for it. Mayweather has no issues whatsoever making welterweight either. Did they demand a catchweight?, I don't think so.
     
  14. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    76,121
    Likes Received:
    2,761
    Totally agree, this fight will never happen. People should have moved on when it failed in 2010.

    Even though Mayweather is to be blamed, Arum isn't exactly keen on making this happen either.
     
  15. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,571
    Likes Received:
    3,764
    Buh? Pac wanted new rules as far as commissioned weight penalties are concerned. Of course he wanted new rules. They both did