71 Ali vs Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kendom, May 30, 2012.


  1. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    58
    Dec 26, 2009
    Good points, I think with Ali's (lack of) power & Rocky's great chin, Marciano would have to be exhausted to get stopped by him, & as we all know, The Rock just kept on going, on & on like an Ariston.
     
  2. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    Seriously? The second Charles was an elbow. He looked fine after the Moore from what I can remember.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,041
    53,351
    Feb 11, 2005
    1971 Frazier head to head versus any version of Marciano. Yes, a different class.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,832
    10,039
    Jul 15, 2008

    I don't ... I feel they pose different match up challenges to different opponents but head to head it is a very difficult fight to pick ... a real nasty fight ... Joe being twenty pounds heavier and faster but Rocky being the better two handed puncher and his low crouch making him very tough for Joe ... just a crazy fight ...
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    I dont recall the Rock being cut by Walcott. swelling yes, cuts no

    Moore? No cuts there either

    Charles? a slice caused by an elbow

    Ali never stopped anyone on cuts outside of Cooper, a freak bleeder with a crappy chin
     
  6. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    How is he a different class? Joe's only real weapon was a left hook. Rocky could hit with either hand so Ali would find Rocky twice as difficult and take twice the pounding. Rock wouldnt take the kind of punishment Joe had to endure tho
     
  7. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,261
    2,477
    Mar 26, 2005
    Prime Marciano would be hell for Ali...
     
  8. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    57
    Jan 15, 2010
    Gotta go with Ali here...and I'm a monster Marciano fan. Frazier posed different styilistic problems for Ali than Marciano would have. He was faster on the attack and his best weapon was the one Ali was most susceptible to....a left hook. Rocky's best punch was his right. In order to land it he'd have to get close enough consistently and tag Ali numerous times with it all the while getting past a rapier jab and an 80 inch reach to do it. I just don't see that happening. In the FOTC, Frazier was able to land his jab quite often on Ali. Joe had an underrated jab, when he chose to use it as well as a very good right hand which he put to good use in that fight as well. It was Joe's speed of attack that kept Ali out of his comfort zone and Rocky, although a great pressure fighter himself, didn't apply his pressure as fast as that version of Frazier. Ali would be able to remain in his comfort zone for longer periods of time against Rocky which would enable him to utilize his speed and reach more effectively while conserving his energy better by sparing his legs more. Rocky would have his moments for sure but he wouldn't have enough of those moments I feel to pull out a win. Styles make fights as always in Boxing and I don't think Rocky had the right stylr to beat that version of Ali. Put a good fight? Of course. Win? No.
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,706
    12,373
    Mar 19, 2012
    Marciano had some advantages. Im not sure that he was the better bodypuncher. I think they both punched to the body pretty damn well. That would be a strength for both guys. Dempsey had better handspeed and put his combinations together better. Jack also had faster feet moving in. He was like a Tiger rushing in. Dempsey was a much faster starter and more explosive early in a fight.

    Had Marciano faced the Giants that Dempsey did he may have worn them down and KOd them eventually late in the fight but I doubt he would blast them out the way Dempsey did.

    They had different styles both effective.
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    WHAT JAB? Frazier never had a jab!

    Also, Joe was a slow starter. Even Cosell & Dunphy acknowledge this
     
  11. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,706
    12,373
    Mar 19, 2012
    Check out Frazier/Quarry from 1969.

    You`ll see Joe Frazier stuffing a quick short jab into Quary face round after round. He couldnt utilize it that much against tall range heavyweight like Ali and Foreman but against guys around his height Joe had a nice jab.
     
  12. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    That's funny because you're all over the place. Is that part of your mystique? Criticize every fighter in some form or another and knock every conventional praise they receive or something? If I weren't to know any better I would've thought you thought Frazier was over-hyped from the comments you routinely spew, along with half the other HW ATGs of course.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,041
    53,351
    Feb 11, 2005
    Frazier was bigger, faster, better footwork, and yes, had better stamina. He was more adapted to fighting real heavyweights. The Rock, who I hold in the greatest esteem, was only a heavyweight in an era deficient of such.

    My opinions are absolutely consistent. Don't play armchair psychiatrist.
     
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    86
    May 30, 2009
    Flat out disagree with this. In fact, I don't see how anyone can reasonably render such a conclusion. You've listed Frazier's supposed advantages, but obviously there is another side to that coin. I believe Frazier is probably a shade ahead of Marciano in terms of H2H against other ATGs (Not necessarily against each other). However, they're in the same realm.

    Don't act like you're consistent or at least not confusing as hell with your criticisms of virtually every HW not named Tyson. I'm not going to search your post history just to prove my point. But what comes to mind is comments from you about Frazier not being strong and losing in a weightlifting contest to a pole vaulter. Which makes me wonder, since you listed Frazier being bigger do you think he's even stronger than the Rock? Would Rocky have lost to the pole vaulter? Irrelevant anyway, I'm just musing here. Along with those comments, others have been along the line of Frazier being suspect in durability, and being bounced around by a limited Foreman.

    And adaptive to fighting real HWs, but certainly not Super HWs (Even when holding a clear stylistic edge). I can still recall the Wlad-Frazier thread awhile back in which you knocked other posters for rose-colored glasses when it came to Joe. Calling Frazier unathletic, small, chinny, and one handed. I suppose Sam Peters is more adaptive to fighting a Super HW then. Frazier can stick to the HWs.
     
  15. Claus Holmen

    Claus Holmen Active Member Full Member

    720
    9
    Oct 16, 2008
    You can´t compare Marciano to Frazier. Frazier took a better punch, had a magnificent left-hook and he weighed 20 punds more than Marciano.
    Ali was not well prepared for Frazier on march 8, 1971. Frazier was in his best shape ever.
    Ezzard Charles was Marcianos most competetive opponent during his reign. Charles - past his prime and 20 pounds lighter than Ali - gave Marciano all he could handle.
    I think Ali would have outboxed Marciano forcing the referee to stop the fight due to a bruised Marciano bleeding from cuts.
    I like Marciano - but I don´t rate him high on my list of the best heavyweight champions.