The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

mayweather has a hot start early in his career so people are quite disappointed that he should have sustained it when he moved up to the higher weights. but he is slowly realizing that he needs to fight boxers taht would be beneficial to his legacy and the mosley and cotto fight does help even if both were late by a few years.

pac get's the benefit of being an unknown fighter but back in the philippines, he started actually as a hot prospect. he also became a world lineal champ at age 19 so there's already a hint that he might be special.

 

of course we should be careful but not to be as paranoid that we have to proofread all our post in a forum before submitting them. my crime was making an error in "tense" and the tool is all over my nut like crazy.

so how come 20% are voting floyd?

 

Pac hands down, this is a feel good question for Pac.

When Mayweather turned pro they said his upside was Leonard and his downside was Sweet Pea lol.

The expectations for Mayweather was extremely high. Which is why he could get a fight with someone like Genaro Hernandez the junior light weight lineal champ at the age of 20-21 in his 18th pro fight to win his first title. And then outclass him by a mile.

 

so can you explain your floyd vote now grammar boy?

 

This...

 

Actually, the expectations from floyd has subsided at the higher weights. floyd gets alot of credit for mosley and cotto, while pac's win over the same opponents were deemed inferior.

 

Ohhh a clean 82%!!!

People are going to be pissed!

 

Pac of course, where do you think the steroids accusations were based from? Haha

 

What you've defined is an overachiever dummy.atsch

 

The question is one which admits pac is less skilled and less talented than floyd

And because of this pac success has exceeded *******s expectation LMAO

 

let's say that you are correct that pac is less skilled and less talented than floyd. but pac has accomplished more than floyd did. who have used better his talents and skills?

 

You just handed him his ass. :yep

 

You need proper grammar to do that on a forum

 

I know I am correct

Pac has not accomplished more than floyd did, only a guy looking at it with ******* eyes will suggest this.

It like saying pac has won more titles at different weight is achieving more. I can easily counter this and say floyd has never lost in any weightclass he has competed in, pac has lost at flyweight, super featherweight and some would go as far as saying he also lost at WW:deal

 

that is terrible reasoning. so you are saying that floyd accomplished more than leonard and duran since he has not lost in any weight class that he fought while duran and leonard lost?

so you think that floyd has accomplished more than pac? if so, then by how much?