Do people have short memories. HOW is Pacquaio Marquez such a big robbery? Compare to

Compare to other big fights.


What's your score card for Pac Marquez?

7-5?
If it's 7-5, that's not even a big robbery.



I had it Pac winning 4 Rounds.
But 2 were not clear cut and back and forth. So that could go either way

So it's Pac 4
Marquez 6
2- Debatable



LEWIS HOLYFIELD 1
On the biggest stage in boxing. HW Title fight
was universally scored by all other then the 3 judges
as 10-2 or 9-3
that's a robbery for a big fight.


I don't understand how a 7-5 card, or even a 7-4-1 card can be considered a 'massive' robbery that Marquez fans won't

stfu about.



Funny Chris Rock interview of Don King in regards to Holyfield Lewis 1. Quote

'WHO'S FAULT WAS IT DON that this robbery happened'

'DON'T YOU BLAME IT ON THE WHITE MEN, it was two black brothers in there'

Don King 'well you see

 

Robbery is too often used to create situations that is not even as big as it really is.


Unless Marquez wins 8 rounds 100% to Pacquaio's 4.

And it's very very clear cut. Then it's a legit huge robbery.

I watched the fight. It wasn't a clear cut 8 rounds to Marquez.

I got it around 6 rounds Marquez 4 Rounds Pac. 2 rounds draw(could go either way)

 

in fairness.

Smaller fights have a lot more robberies

Lewis Holyfield was for the HW Title which at the time was still the flagship in boxing.

PAC-Marquez was a huge event as well.


Lara robbery was 10 times worst then Marquez obviously since it was very clear cut.

 

That's debatable.

I don't care about Pac or Floyd, but a lot of people said

Pac won 4 Rounds. And 2 was very un clear.

So at best it's 6-4-2

2 Rounds were back and forth though, so favorable judges could easily have scored that for Pacquaio.


once again it's not like the situation where it's Lewis Holyfield

or even Oscar Trinidad EARLY ROUNDS where it was universally agreed that the rounds were 100% clear cut

 

I had pacquaio winning 4 rounds . Clear Cut.


But 2-3 of the rounds were back and forth which means that judges could have scored it either way.

It still was obviously a Marquez WIN. But it's not as big of a robbery as people claim it is

 

I'm not trolling, because I could give a **** about either fighter. I'm 100% serious.

Also you scored it 9-4

That's 13 Rounds.... lol


I had it Pac 4 rounds.
Marquez 6-7

BUT 1-2 WERE NOT CLEAR CUT.

That's the point, if the rounds were not clear cut. It's hard to say.

Lewis Holyfield 1

was clear cut Lewis 10 Holyfield 2.

That's a robbery.
There was no close rounds, it was just Holyfield eating the jab and head butting.

 

Good job.

Ya we need more neutrals like us to watch the fight. It's hard to be 'neutral' when you are in awe of Floyd Pac or Marquez.

I don't even know their resumes. I just watch it and got it

Pacquaio winning 4 rounds.. That's it 4

BUT 2-3 were un clear and could go either way.

I PERSONALLY have it 8-4 Marquez

except I know judges can have it 7-5 Pacquiao. I can see why because 2-3 of the Marquez rounds, you can make a case for Pacquaio.