This was not a robbery; it was a close fight that could of gone either way.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Money, Jun 9, 2012.


  1. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    6,312
    0
    Dec 1, 2009
    There's no difference. You are just as bad and biased as *******s.
     
  2. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Timmy won 2, 4 if you are generous to him.
     
  3. TJay

    TJay Member Full Member

    432
    0
    May 26, 2012
    The Marquez fight was a close fight and I felt any decision would have been acceptable. This was not the same. No way.
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    As a fan that thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in their third fight, I thought that was possibly the worst robbery I've ever seen. I thought Bradley thought 3 rounds if you were his mother. Let alone 3, let alone 5, let alone 6, let alone 7?!?!?!?!? Insanity. The 6 companions at my side agreed. Blatant robbery. Close rounds does not mean close fight.
     
  5. ViktorVaughn

    ViktorVaughn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,924
    0
    Jul 18, 2008
    I disagree with the lopsided view but anyway. Which round did he win according to you? 11th? 12th?
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    82
    May 30, 2009
    I did too, but the people around me vehemently disagreed. The thing is, Pac won his 6 rounds far more clearly IMHO. He swept 4-9 easily. The rounds Bradley won, the ones we awarded him were far far closer. I really can't even envision seeing Bradley getting 7 rounds. Pac clearly won because of this, and I think it's right up there with the last Marquez-Pac decision.
     
  7. punchy88

    punchy88 Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Feb 11, 2012
    Do you ****s have any idea what clean effective punching is?

    Have idea on how to discern what is a clean and effective punch. Tim did more? No he ****ing didnt. His activity was not effective at all. Even where he appeared to be landing more punches he wasn't effective, landing clubbing shots, and more often then not these shots were partially blocked. So if during the round he appeared to have landed more shots Pacquaio EASILY offset this activity by landing the few effective and definitive shots in the fight.

    Bradley might have looked busy but he wasn't EFFECTIVE. Even when pacquaio took his foot off the gas the few powershots he'd land in the later rounds offset the few jabs and pitty pat punches Timothy would throw that were almost always taken on the gloves.
     
  8. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Reminds me of Whitaker-Chavez. Pretty close fight could've gone either way...
     
  9. jg77

    jg77 New Member Full Member

    20
    0
    May 4, 2012
    Gave him the 11th. He won 2 at the most. He was getting whipped around the whole fight. He even admitted that he lost, so I don't even know why we're discussing this. Bradley is a joke, what a sellout, he went along with the whole plan.
     
  10. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
  11. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Robbery. Point Blank.
     
  12. Hydro11

    Hydro11 Active Member Full Member

    1,137
    1
    Jun 2, 2011
    Completely agree. I had the fight a draw myself at 6 rounds each. I did think that Pac won his rounds by far more than Bradley won his. A close Bradley decision is a bad one but not a horrible one.
     
  13. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,521
    614
    Aug 23, 2010
    I had the fight 8-4 or 7-5 for Manny. The fight was already over IMO when they made it to the championship rounds.
     
  14. The13thRound

    The13thRound Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,403
    43
    May 4, 2009
    :ban:ban:ban
     
  15. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    :deal:deal:deal

    couldnt agree more