I hate it when *****s say that Pacquiao looks ordinary against movers/slicksters

Good comeback, maybe write it down so you can use it again :thumbsup

Pac gets schooled by Marquez, then loses to Bradley... But being a typical *******, you try to divert the attention/blame onto someone else, first Mayweather then Hamed, to hide the failings of your posterboy hero.

Im sorry person, but you are the ******

:good

 

I know ur bf lost. It hurts i know. Youll be okay i promise :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Then he should of won more convincingly, via ko and kept the decision out of the judges hands.

 

Yep, staying on topic whilst you can only discredit other boxers to make you feel better.

Look familiar?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA9eBd_Zu0c[/ame]

 

This content is protected

 

Manny can't beat slick fighters, the truth hurts. Manny is a fight that likes to trade punches in the middle of the ring. Slick fighters knows the SWEET SCIENCE, hitting without getting hit.

 

And Pacriod lost, THE END

 

Lol Bradley ain't slick. Good fighter, just not slick.

 

How could Bradley move when both his ankles were broken?

 

Bradley can't get to him? No surprise. Bradley swings more than the 60's. Head down arms flailing. The fight was a complete fix but, you don't have to be a "*****" to notice that Pacquiao somewhat struggles against slick opponents.