I hate it when *****s say that Pacquiao looks ordinary against movers/slicksters

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by _Duran_, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Neither Pac or Bradley could hit anything, at least Bradley consistently scored to the body. Pacman just bashed the air all night.
     
  2. _Duran_

    _Duran_ Ugly Mofocker Full Member

    872
    0
    Dec 23, 2010
    is that an excuse or what
     
  3. Rizoom

    Rizoom Member Full Member

    436
    0
    Jun 6, 2012
    pacquiao landed more.

    landed heavier punches.

    hurt bradley while bradley couldn't hurt pacquiao.


    plus tbh like 20-25 of the punches credited to bradley was just those 2-3 instances when they were in a clinch and bradley was just pitty-patting pacquiao's side like 6-7 times before the break.
     
  4. _Duran_

    _Duran_ Ugly Mofocker Full Member

    872
    0
    Dec 23, 2010
    huh?
     
  5. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,698
    870
    Aug 23, 2010
    Bradley isn't slick. Bradley is a come forward fighter with all around skill.
     
  6. Rizoom

    Rizoom Member Full Member

    436
    0
    Jun 6, 2012
    also a lot of punches thrown credited to bradley also was when he would throw jabs lightly as like a range finder before they're even within range of each other.
     
  7. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009
    Then why couldn't Pacquiao catch him with his straight left and knock him out?

    Pacquiao should have KO'd Bradley if Bradley isn't slick