Thats right, I had a draw. I gave Bradley rounds 1 and 3, 2 was also close and gave him round 4. Also won the last 3 rounds so thats my card. How can anybody say bradlery only won 1 or 2 rounds!?!?!?! Bradley won the last 3 rounds for sure. Gave Pac movement, working a jab and Pac wasnt swinging. so everybody thats on Pac's nuts needs to realize u gotta give him at 4 rounds with the last 3 and the first round. Pac was throwing and not landing much when he did, also took the first 2 minutes of every round off and just tried to steal with them at the end. This is totally his fault and he could"ve just took 40 mil and fight the best fighter of his generation but he chose to stick with the snake Arum and his own man did him in last night.
****in joke. Pac got robbed. And no I am not a *******, look at my past posts. The guy who did not land one clean punch won the fight - ****in hilarious. I saw it on mute and still scored it 117-112. As if Marquez getting robbed wasn't bad enough. Serves the sport right when ppl say **** boxing and switch to MMA. Too bad, that **** doesn't work for me or I would have stopped watching this wwe clone.
I do think that 'stealing' rounds is bull**** and judges should be looking at the whole rounds. My blood was boiling when Lampley was saying that Bradley won 2 minutes 50 seconds of the first round then stole the round with three straight lefts. We all knew that Lampley is Pac's cheerleader though.
the only thing I have to say is that Bradley won the last 3 rounds for sure, and he won the first so your card at the least needs to be 8-4. which u dont have so i think your card is ****ed up!!
Are you blind? How can you give rounds to a guy when he doesn't win in any aspect of the fight. The fight was controlled by Pacquiao and fought on his terms. He outlanded, outhustled and outsmarted timothy. Fine I can undestand how you can give 3-4 rounds maxium beacuse of bias toward Tim. But to call this fight a Tim fight or let alone a draw is just ignorant and ******ed.
People are making it sound like it was way wider than it really was. I don't think Pacquiao has a real case for winning anything after the 7th round. That said, there's no way Bradley won more than six rounds. A draw is the biggest stretch you can have, imho. I think the judges (as were most people) were expecting a lot more from Manny, and his overall lackluster performance (apart from some signs of brilliance in rounds 3 to 6) made them give Bradley rounds he didn't really win. It was a bad decision, but the 11-1, 10-2 and 9-3 scores I hear about are laughable. I think the judge that had it 115-113 for Pac was spot on.
I thought it was close, for the same reasons as the TS Bradley definitely swept the end of the fight. Manny swept the middle rounds. I thought Bradley won the 1st, the 2nd could've gone either way, and (most if not all) of the last 4. Manny won his rounds more convincingly but he didn't win many more than Bradley. The fight was closer than people realise. Watch it again! On another note, the last few rounds prove what every knowledgeable boxing fan has been saying all along. Pacquiao is one dimensional. That one dimension is good enough to beat most fighters...but when you box him he struggles. Proof is in the pudding.
bradly knew he was losing...his coach knew he was losing...his wife knew he was losing... i guess they where all wrong... what can be said about boxing? its becoming the biggest joke after figure skating (judge wise)
How can u say ******ed. did u see the last 3 rounds???? Bradley clearly won those rounds, now u give him rounds 1 and or any rounds of 2-4 and how can u not have a draw or close fight??