BS STFU that **** wasn't a dominant performance... why because Bradley was going bakwards and picking his spots and boxing on the backfoot or just cause one is going forward you think that is walking him down when bradley was ducking most shots and making PAC miss. it was a close fight that PAC won... PAC didn't dominate **** the last 4 rounds he took them off, and the only time he got to bradley was in mid fight... but the fight ain't score of off that mid rounds where he got to bradley at times... plus taking 2 minutes off and trying to win the last minute is stupid as he just got outboxed at points... regardless.. PAC won by 8-4... Marquez won by 4-5 points that night... so 8-4, 9-3 Marquez put a Boxing clinic that night
i had it for pac 116-112 but voted bradley to be a dick hahahaha After the Marquez fight the amount of *******s posting on this forum decreased significantly (and their alts increased significantly).....I think we'll see more of the same.....1 more poor performance and they might be gone for good!
Any combination of 1,2,5,7,8 that you choose along with 10,11,& 12. The last third was pretty widely accepted as Bradley rounds, the 1 and 2 also were very competitive and either one or both could be Bradley rounds...also the 5th,7th, and 8th were close rounds that could go either way. If you choose to give Manny every close round then sure you could think the decision was wide, but if you split those rounds and combine them with the generally accepted Bradley rounds, you get what you got, a close ass fight that could go either way.
As lopsided as the poll numbers are, they still aren't lopsided enough. I just don't see how anyone can say Bradley won...even most the rounds he did win are nickpicky rounds...rounds where'd you have to find a reason to give it to him. I thought Pac won just as clearly, if not clearer than Lara did over Williams.