Did anyone realize that Pac got outboxed over the last 6 rounds?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by compukiller, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,564
    Feb 28, 2012
    You need to chill, what the **** has religion got to do with boxing?

    Keep your own delusion to yourself.
     
  2. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    "Can you believe that? Unbelievable," Arum said. "I went over to Bradley before the decision and he said, `I tried hard but I couldn't beat the guy.' " -ESPN-
     
  3. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    Pacquiao didn't close the fight well but he still clearly won IMO.

    Landed the cleaner shots and won more than 6 rounds.
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    People fell for the trap that just because Tim did better the last half of the fight, that it means he was winning the rounds. It happens all the time when a dude's losing clearly- they start giving credit for "moral victories".

    He didn't start getting rounds until the last third of the fight. Even in the rounds where Tim could have an argument, Pac contested them except for one round that Pac pretty much took off entirely.

    And I ****ing dare you to tell me with a straight face that you gave Bradley the fifth, because the judges did and that's the smoking gun of how they screwed Pac. The fix was in.
     
  5. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
     
  6. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    True. I couldn't see giving him more than 2 or 3 out of the last 6. As a whole I would say he was outboxed over the last 6 rds. Still should have won the fight though. It did seem like he either let up a bit or wore down as he fight went on. Bradley also made some subtle adjustments that were keeping Pacquiao from landing. I'll have to watch it again to get a better feel.
     
  7. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,407
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    I had it 7-5 Pac or 6-6, really not the massive robbery people are making out. Bradley won the 1st, Pac 2-8ish and then Bradley took over or Pac just faded as he tends to do recently. There is absolutely no way you can give Pac the last few rounds or the 1st.

    The British commentary was horrific and it sounds like the HBO one was even worse. Need to mute these ****ers.

    Ps before i get called a ***** or whatever, i wanted Pac to win so **** you :blurp
     
  8. D-G-TheTruth

    D-G-TheTruth Active Member Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 17, 2010
    The British commentary really annoyed me, so biased towards PAC, anything he threw they would jizz in their pants over it,I had it 7-5 pac
     
  9. D-G-TheTruth

    D-G-TheTruth Active Member Full Member

    518
    0
    Oct 17, 2010
    :good
    Totally agree
     
  10. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Listen, I will say this Bradley was trying the second have of the fight. He was more ACTIVE in terms of aggression and ring generalship and Pacman was on cruse control. To be honest I had Pacman barley winning but he didn't dominate.