Full scorecards only! Bradley vs. Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by megavolt, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I had it 9-3,maybe 8-4,but if you look at the sixth round you see a good example of a man scoring better for two mins,then another scoring excellently for 1 min.
    I haven't seen the cards yet though,gonna try and find.
     
  2. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    :good What was your reasoning for Rounds 1 and 2? I had it the opposite
     
  3. Leavemealone

    Leavemealone Active Member Full Member

    503
    0
    May 19, 2012
    1. pac
    2. pac
    3. pac
    4. pac
    5. pac
    6. pac
    7. pac
    8. tim
    9. pac
    10. tim
    11. tim
    12. tim


    116-112 Pac
     
  4. PaoloMirani

    PaoloMirani Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    1
    Oct 31, 2010
    I gave Bradley one legit round---the 10nth, but that one was really an even round and could just as easily have been another Pac round. The 11 and 12, Bradley's punches were all pretty much meaningless...really, this is the problem with certain scoring criteria, did you really think Bradley was "trying" to win those late rounds? No, he was moving around so he wouldn't get rocked anymore. So ****, Pac didn't land a bomb? What do you expect when your opponent had ceased being a warrior and is now a running man. After, the 6th Timid Tim had totally forgotten all about his big talk before the fight and was really just trying to avoid getting knocked out. Yet he gets rewarded for "boxing", seriously......**** man , it wasn't like he was pulling a Marquez and actually landed.
     
  5. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    4
    Jun 16, 2008
    1: 10-9 Pacquiao
    2: 10-10 Draw
    3: 10-9 Pacquiao
    4: 10-9 Pacquiao
    5: 10-9 Pacquiao
    6: 10-9 Pacquiao
    7: 10-9 Pacquiao
    8: 10-9 Pacquiao
    9: 10-9 Pacquiao
    10: 10-9 Bradley
    11: 10-9 Bradley
    12: 10-9 Pacquiao

    9-2-1, 118-11 Pacquiao.
     
  6. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    What are you talking about the 6th? I scored that for Pac.

    Bradley threw way more than Pac did in the last 2 rounds, I don't know what two rounds you're looking at.
     
  7. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
  8. stillth3sameg

    stillth3sameg Woolly Rhino Full Member

    1,896
    0
    Sep 16, 2009
    Bradley---Pacquiao
    10-9
    10-9
    10-9
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    9-10
    10-9
    9-10
    10-9
    9-10
    9-10

    7-5 for pacman... But I gave some close rounds to Pac due to him being the champ
     
  9. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,470
    29,349
    Jan 18, 2010
    I scored it 8-4 (116-112)

    Pac of course
     
  10. Mrpacman

    Mrpacman Guest

    Pacquiao-Bradley

    1 10-9
    2 10-9
    3 10-9
    4 10-8
    5 10-9
    6 10-9
    7 10-9
    8 10-9
    9 10-9
    10 10-9
    11 10-9
    12 10-9

    120-107 Pacquiao. Pacquiao is true champion!!!
     
  11. PNoyFightFanUSN

    PNoyFightFanUSN Larry Don't Give a **** Full Member

    6,836
    2
    Apr 9, 2010
    rounds 2,7,10,12 went to Bradley. I was posting updates to facebook while watching for friends who weren't able to see it but it looks like 2,10,and 12 are consensus Bradley rounds
     
  12. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    I liked round 5 for bradley more than round 7. There were indeed a handful of close rounds though. (1, 2, 5, 9)

    I think the last 3 were concrete bradley rounds imo
     
  13. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    116-112 Pac, gave 1, 10, 12 and I think one of the mid rounds to Bradley.
     
  14. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,410
    29,754
    Apr 4, 2005
    Round 1 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac simply didn't do enough
    Round 2 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 3 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 4 - 10-10 Even - couldn't separate the 2 of them
    Round 5 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 6 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 7 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 8 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 9 - 10-9 Pac
    Round 10 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac began to tire and was outworked
    Round 11 - 9-10 Bradley - same as round 10
    Round 12 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac looked tired simply didn't do enough

    116 - 113 Pacquiao

    It was a competitive fight but I can't see how anyone could score it for anyone but Pacquiao. Pacquiao is clearly in decline. His footwork wasn't as good as it has been and he now has stamina issues late in the fight. Pacquiao has lost the intensity and high work rate that he was once known for.
     
  15. Saltzy

    Saltzy Bam-O Full Member

    2,815
    17
    Jul 23, 2004
    I don't understand the logic of saying Bradley doesn't have enough power so he automatically loses?

    Just because someone doesn't have enough power to hurt another fighter doesn't mean jack ****! If you can win a fight because another fighter can't hurt you then Oliver Mccall and George Chuvalo would be undefeated. Its uterrly rediculous thinking.

    Bradley landed good punches and did decent body work. I don't believe he won the fight but I do think it was a lot closer than the biased HBO crew makes it out to be. Ledderman scores fights on if a fight is bleeding or has a busted up face, ******ation at its finest.