I had it 9-3,maybe 8-4,but if you look at the sixth round you see a good example of a man scoring better for two mins,then another scoring excellently for 1 min. I haven't seen the cards yet though,gonna try and find.
I gave Bradley one legit round---the 10nth, but that one was really an even round and could just as easily have been another Pac round. The 11 and 12, Bradley's punches were all pretty much meaningless...really, this is the problem with certain scoring criteria, did you really think Bradley was "trying" to win those late rounds? No, he was moving around so he wouldn't get rocked anymore. So ****, Pac didn't land a bomb? What do you expect when your opponent had ceased being a warrior and is now a running man. After, the 6th Timid Tim had totally forgotten all about his big talk before the fight and was really just trying to avoid getting knocked out. Yet he gets rewarded for "boxing", seriously......**** man , it wasn't like he was pulling a Marquez and actually landed.
1: 10-9 Pacquiao 2: 10-10 Draw 3: 10-9 Pacquiao 4: 10-9 Pacquiao 5: 10-9 Pacquiao 6: 10-9 Pacquiao 7: 10-9 Pacquiao 8: 10-9 Pacquiao 9: 10-9 Pacquiao 10: 10-9 Bradley 11: 10-9 Bradley 12: 10-9 Pacquiao 9-2-1, 118-11 Pacquiao.
What are you talking about the 6th? I scored that for Pac. Bradley threw way more than Pac did in the last 2 rounds, I don't know what two rounds you're looking at.
Bradley---Pacquiao 10-9 10-9 10-9 9-10 9-10 9-10 9-10 10-9 9-10 10-9 9-10 9-10 7-5 for pacman... But I gave some close rounds to Pac due to him being the champ
Pacquiao-Bradley 1 10-9 2 10-9 3 10-9 4 10-8 5 10-9 6 10-9 7 10-9 8 10-9 9 10-9 10 10-9 11 10-9 12 10-9 120-107 Pacquiao. Pacquiao is true champion!!!
rounds 2,7,10,12 went to Bradley. I was posting updates to facebook while watching for friends who weren't able to see it but it looks like 2,10,and 12 are consensus Bradley rounds
I liked round 5 for bradley more than round 7. There were indeed a handful of close rounds though. (1, 2, 5, 9) I think the last 3 were concrete bradley rounds imo
Round 1 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac simply didn't do enough Round 2 - 10-9 Pac Round 3 - 10-9 Pac Round 4 - 10-10 Even - couldn't separate the 2 of them Round 5 - 10-9 Pac Round 6 - 10-9 Pac Round 7 - 10-9 Pac Round 8 - 10-9 Pac Round 9 - 10-9 Pac Round 10 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac began to tire and was outworked Round 11 - 9-10 Bradley - same as round 10 Round 12 - 9-10 Bradley - Pac looked tired simply didn't do enough 116 - 113 Pacquiao It was a competitive fight but I can't see how anyone could score it for anyone but Pacquiao. Pacquiao is clearly in decline. His footwork wasn't as good as it has been and he now has stamina issues late in the fight. Pacquiao has lost the intensity and high work rate that he was once known for.
I don't understand the logic of saying Bradley doesn't have enough power so he automatically loses? Just because someone doesn't have enough power to hurt another fighter doesn't mean jack ****! If you can win a fight because another fighter can't hurt you then Oliver Mccall and George Chuvalo would be undefeated. Its uterrly rediculous thinking. Bradley landed good punches and did decent body work. I don't believe he won the fight but I do think it was a lot closer than the biased HBO crew makes it out to be. Ledderman scores fights on if a fight is bleeding or has a busted up face, ******ation at its finest.