What if Mayweather/Cotto was scored for cotto?

Ofcourse it would!

 

Oscar fight is better to compare

 

Mayweather doesn't have to worry about that kind of thing because he's not stupid enough to have Bob Arum as his promoter.

 

Of course. And Mayweather probably was saved from it because he was going to jail.

 

Hell no! it was much closer that Pac vs. Bradley.

 

Hell yeah

 

:good

 

Yes it should have been considered a robbery. Any reasonable boxing fan will admit Floyd cleanly won against Cotto and so did Pacquiao against Bradley. Pacquiao-Marquez III was a very close fight.

 

Yes. Which is why the Tim "victory" is under even more scrutiny. PAC dominated Tim more than the margins that Floyd beat Miguel....which was a clear victory for Floyd. Cotto gave a great account for himself...

Tim didn't give a good account of himself at all....other than proving he is durable and game.....he was exposed as not being ready for people on PAC's level...which pretty much means Floyd.

 

Cotto did very well but he clearly lost. Giving a great account of himself is one thing....but if he had of gotten the nod there would have been cries of a robbery and they would be correct.

Again....Miguel did extremley well. But he did lose. Clearly.

 

I recall hearing a lot of people saying Oscar deserved the nod over Mayweather, based on his being the "aggressor". Well, where are those people to defend this decision now?

Oh ya, that's right, they were all Pacquaio fans...

 

i thought Cotto vs Mayweather was alot closer fight than Bradley Pac. Alot Coser!!

Mayweather Cotto was a competetive clear win for floyd.

Manny Bradey was just a clear Win. it wasnt even competetive

 

43-0

 

It would have been a disgusting robbery, but not as much of a disgusting robbery as Pacquiao-Bradley. Mayweather won clearly. Pacquiao won even more clearly.