Pacquiao did give the last three rounds away. Again don't listen to the commentators. Bradley landed clean shots, but he was never close to being knocked out, yet the commentators try to make it seem that way. And they would sometimes lie, they talk about punches that never landed. Pacquiao lands a punch and they make a big deal about it.
When people rewatch it, do it with this. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKzCWHtivPc[/ame] No bias commentary (unless you speak that language..)
Pac landed more overall shots, harded shots and in more rounds. So, someone please explain to me how Bradely won! I know what I saw! It wasn't Bradely landing more consistantly than Pac. Pac was never once staggered, Bradely was. Bradely out landed Pac in 3-4 rounds but, in all but one of those rounds Pac landed the harder shots. I'm not some ******* like many on here like to call Pac fans. I was one of the guys saying that this was a soilid fight for MP. So don't start your response with nosense. I really want to know how people saw Bradely winning the fight. Explain the logic because I'm totally lost on this one.
How have you give round 4 to bradley ? If i remember correctly wasn't that the round when he was hurt and hung on for like the last 10seconds of the round?
can i ask are you black or white ? i only ask as there seems a pattern emerging of black dudes saying bradley won
Was round 4 the round Bradley hugged Pac and grabbed the ropes behind Pac and refused to let go so the ref had to physically break the grip?
There was no mention of HBO. He said check your eyesight. That's called deflection, and it's intellectually lazy. It also alludes to an agenda.
Same result, 118-110. Bradley at no point had any semblance of control in that bout. The two rounds that he won were 10-11. That was more due to the inactivity of Pacquiao. I watched the Boxing Nation broadcast the first time I scored it.