Floyd Mayweather will dissect Bradley like a science teacher dissects a frog during lab class based on what I saw Saturday. Bradley has heart and determination but against Mayweather he is totally outclassed, too many weapons on Mayweather's arsenal.
Tim Billionaire. There is no blueprint. Look for him to pick Floyd up and literally carry him to the ropes like Cotto did.
That's becuase you don't know **** about boxing. Bradley wouldn't beat Floyd, but his aggressive defense, relentlessness, strenght, volume punching, pressure, and roughhouse tactics would keep Floyd off balance when he's up close, so Floyd wouldn't be able to put much in his shots. The only chance Floyd would get to hit Bradley with hard shots is in the center of the ring, but even then, Bradley is elusive, and hard to hit with any more than one punch at a time. Floyd would be cautious enough to let Bradley off the hook, and it would go right back to the ropes. Floyd would have to work his ASS off. Bradley would mostly land on gloves and air, but some judges may favor his aggression. It would be an ugly fight. IT would be Floyd's HARDEST fight. Styles make fights.
I don't see it as the complete domination everyone does. Bradley won't box here he'll pressure Floyd all of the fight and that should work better vs Floyd than it did against Pacquiao. His headbutts could come into play more, Floyd does not shy away from clinches and is usually good at avoiding any potential head clashes, using elbows, headlocks, pushdowns, etc..but Bradley is an experienced headbutter. He gets picked apart througout the fight as he can be sloppy getting his punches off, UD for sure, but I can see him making it uncomfortable for Floyd at various stages with the pressure he puts on him.
So you start off by saying Bradley wouldnt beat Floyd as an argument to my statement i dont see how he beats Floyd in anyway.:think Floyd has been in with plenty of agressors...that didnt sway judges to give the fight to them. Bradley is hardly the the most agressive fighter Floyd has seen nor is he that good either. Basicly your wanting bradely to get a gift.....tell me how he soundly beats Floyd.....not a friggin gift or a mirage about aggressiveness...which again your counting on judges to award a whole fight to this guy on nothing but aggresiveness but you go on to say Bradley doesnt land much of anything.:think Then you said something like Bradley's rough housing tactics....have you seen a Floyd Mayweather fight? Bradley does not want to go that route at all....he couldnt even rough up Pac! Furthermore on the inside he would not be strong enough to muscle Floyd around and i have not seen him be so crafty on the inside that suggests to me he can hang with Floyd who fights extremely well on the inside. Then you said Floyd could only land hard shots in the middle of the ring...WRONG...on the ropes or even in the corner where you think bradley does this godly work at for some reason, Floyd is very sneaky with short shots and they are solid...he has buckled and clearly buzzed 154 pund fighters with these shots...see Cotto/Oscar fights....he also has a slew of fights throughout his career where he lands these type of solid shots...Bradley can't afford to take those. i don't think Floyd would have to work his ASS off as you put it....i think he worked his ass off against Cotto who is better than Bradley and Floyd still, even out of his wieght comfort zone, won clearly 8 to 9 rounds. This was with a fighter who had a very nice jab, was aggressive, used is size, put FLoyd on the ropes and corner several times....he did damn near everything....and won 3-4 rounds. Your telling me Timothy Bradley will win solely off agression???!?!? You using glass eye's to watch fights or what?
If Bradley moved his big head as little as he did against Pacman, Mayweather would take it off before the halfway point.
This is the dumbest thing I read so far. Look at how easily Pacquiao landed combinations on Cotto, Mayweather's last opponent, than contrast that with Bradley. Cotto was basically EATING combinations.