Tim Bradley will give Floyd Mayweather hell

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by megavolt, Jun 11, 2012.


  1. EONS

    EONS Active Member Full Member

    756
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    Floyd Mayweather will dissect Bradley like a science teacher dissects a frog during lab class based on what I saw Saturday. Bradley has heart and determination but against Mayweather he is totally outclassed, too many weapons on Mayweather's arsenal.
     
  2. bigtime-skills

    bigtime-skills Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,540
    102
    Apr 20, 2007
    That better not be GLASS in your Roy Jones avatar, lol....Funny as hell
     
  3. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Tim Billionaire. There is no blueprint.

    Look for him to pick Floyd up and literally carry him to the ropes like Cotto did.
     
  4. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    i do not see absolutely anyway for Bradley to beat Floyd.....absolutely not anyway.
     
  5. Diamond Eye

    Diamond Eye Guest

    That's becuase you don't know **** about boxing.

    Bradley wouldn't beat Floyd, but his aggressive defense, relentlessness, strenght, volume punching, pressure, and roughhouse tactics would keep Floyd off balance when he's up close, so Floyd wouldn't be able to put much in his shots.

    The only chance Floyd would get to hit Bradley with hard shots is in the center of the ring, but even then, Bradley is elusive, and hard to hit with any more than one punch at a time.

    Floyd would be cautious enough to let Bradley off the hook, and it would go right back to the ropes.

    Floyd would have to work his ASS off. Bradley would mostly land on gloves and air, but some judges may favor his aggression.

    It would be an ugly fight.

    IT would be Floyd's HARDEST fight. Styles make fights.
     
  6. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009
    I don't see it as the complete domination everyone does. Bradley won't box here he'll pressure Floyd all of the fight and that should work better vs Floyd than it did against Pacquiao. His headbutts could come into play more, Floyd does not shy away from clinches and is usually good at avoiding any potential head clashes, using elbows, headlocks, pushdowns, etc..but Bradley is an experienced headbutter. He gets picked apart througout the fight as he can be sloppy getting his punches off, UD for sure, but I can see him making it uncomfortable for Floyd at various stages with the pressure he puts on him.
     
  7. luy32

    luy32 Guest

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:D:D
     
  8. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
    Bradley by UD. All Bradley has to to is to win 1 round and he gets the decision.
     
  9. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    93,552
    28,275
    Jan 18, 2010
    Yep, when it's frozen over... :roll:

    This content is protected
     
  10. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,049
    Oct 25, 2006
    I think it'd be a mismatch if Bradley fought Mayweather. Mayweather is just way too good.
     
  11. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
    So you start off by saying Bradley wouldnt beat Floyd as an argument to my statement i dont see how he beats Floyd in anyway.:think

    Floyd has been in with plenty of agressors...that didnt sway judges to give the fight to them. Bradley is hardly the the most agressive fighter Floyd has seen nor is he that good either.

    Basicly your wanting bradely to get a gift.....tell me how he soundly beats Floyd.....not a friggin gift or a mirage about aggressiveness...which again your counting on judges to award a whole fight to this guy on nothing but aggresiveness but you go on to say Bradley doesnt land much of anything.:think

    Then you said something like Bradley's rough housing tactics....have you seen a Floyd Mayweather fight? Bradley does not want to go that route at all....he couldnt even rough up Pac! Furthermore on the inside he would not be strong enough to muscle Floyd around and i have not seen him be so crafty on the inside that suggests to me he can hang with Floyd who fights extremely well on the inside.

    Then you said Floyd could only land hard shots in the middle of the ring...WRONG...on the ropes or even in the corner where you think bradley does this godly work at for some reason, Floyd is very sneaky with short shots and they are solid...he has buckled and clearly buzzed 154 pund fighters with these shots...see Cotto/Oscar fights....he also has a slew of fights throughout his career where he lands these type of solid shots...Bradley can't afford to take those.

    i don't think Floyd would have to work his ASS off as you put it....i think he worked his ass off against Cotto who is better than Bradley and Floyd still, even out of his wieght comfort zone, won clearly 8 to 9 rounds. This was with a fighter who had a very nice jab, was aggressive, used is size, put FLoyd on the ropes and corner several times....he did damn near everything....and won 3-4 rounds.

    Your telling me Timothy Bradley will win solely off agression???!?!?

    You using glass eye's to watch fights or what?
     
  12. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Unlike Pac, Mayweather would really win about 11 rounds.
     
  13. simmo

    simmo Active Member Full Member

    849
    1
    Feb 18, 2012
    If Bradley moved his big head as little as he did against Pacman, Mayweather would take it off before the halfway point.
     
  14. Diamond Eye

    Diamond Eye Guest

    This is the dumbest thing I read so far.

    Look at how easily Pacquiao landed combinations on Cotto, Mayweather's last opponent, than contrast that with Bradley.

    Cotto was basically EATING combinations.
     
  15. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    4,486
    1
    Jul 31, 2010
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::rofl:rofl