STATS GURU: Pacquiao's Loss Was Almost Statistically Impossible

This content is protected

 

English really isn't a hard language to learn.

 

Agree with that statement.

 

that sums up my night right there.

 

I agree that there should be more judges. Less split decision, less draw. More expensive to bribe the outcome. Additionally, scores should be submitted each round to make doctoring the scorecard difficult.

 

You can still get fat if you sit around drinking 2% milk all day, can't you?

 

i love how stats mean nothing, but thats all thats talked about when 2 guys fights

 

:yep
Funny thing is, if that 2 percen( of my reaction is right, that also means your statement is true. Only not plausable. :yep

 

I can give a **** less what this means stats of those who have an opinion who cares.

Lets see Round by Round Punch stats, not final stats but round by round.

This was no Robbery the 1st three and the last three went to Tim, even if you scored one round even in the middle you still have a Bradley win

 

This is an amazingly clear .gif image, I wonder how it was made so well.

 

lmao

 

So why were the odds in Vegas 3 to 1?

 

very cool

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1656951

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1656951

1 in 93 respectabe boxing writers agree with you too

:hey