Andre Ward: "Tim Bradley Should Give His Belt Back"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Diamond Eye, Jun 12, 2012.


  1. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010

    That the best **** you can come up with? Stop tryin so hard dude , there are better things to do.
     
  2. Daruf

    Daruf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,127
    4
    Jan 7, 2006
    Ward is absolutely right although i doubt he would do it himself.
    Doubt any boxer would tbh.
     
  3. Archer

    Archer Guest

    Andre Ward is a great fighter, and he is talented, and is a top 10 fighter around, and no one is gonna argue that, but this mother****er is sounding stupid. What good is giving the belt back gonna do? Ward is just trying to gain some fans so they will watch his next fight.

    The best thing to do is sign the contract for the rematch, and fight again with different judges.

    Nothing will change though, and at the end of that fight Tim Bradley is gonna be 30-0, and still champ, and y'all still be little bitches.
     
  4. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Tim got some buck teeth.:D
     
  5. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    Then after Manny gets his belt back, he should give it to JMM. Everyone's happy.
     
  6. gyll

    gyll Undetectable Full Member

    5,882
    0
    Jan 27, 2010
    Ward is one of my faves but if he really made that comment I'm throwing him under a bus. Dumbest thing a boxer can say. First of all, the belt should be given back to Marquez, not Pacquiao. Secondly, an immediate rematch is what the fans and Pacquiao deserves. Nothing more, nothing less. And if they don't want the rematch tell them to go fist themselves. You fought hard and it's not your fault the judges made a decision that's largely deemed as unacceptable.
     
  7. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Why should the belt be given to JMM? Him and PAC had a close fight. If JMM dominated PAC like PAC dominated Tim and JMM was robbed it would be a completely different situation.

    PAC won an unpopular decision......Just like the unpopular decision that Floyd got when he faced JLC the first time.

    Tim was the recipient of a bogus "W" for the WBO 147 title. His own friend is telling it like it is. While I don't agree that Tim should have to give up his belt, i do believe Ward is correct...that it would go a long way for Tim's stock which has been badly damaged.

    Tim didn't want to win this way....he didnt' ask to be under the micron-microscope based on a robbery he had nothing to do with. It's Tim that will be going through the trials and tribulations that comes with being on the winning side of a high profile robbery...not PAC.

    I'm cool with a rematch....it was a good fight....one sided...but a fun fight to watch.
     
  8. Luzon

    Luzon Member Full Member

    320
    0
    Dec 5, 2006
    Exactly.. He gotta just play the game.. He got another big payday comin if he plays his cards right... I wouldn't concede either knowing this gift can make me more millions... I will concede after I made all I can out of this though
     
  9. Luzon

    Luzon Member Full Member

    320
    0
    Dec 5, 2006
    Ummmm Tim vs. Pac totally different from jmm vs. pac.. 1 fight was one sided and the other could have gone either way.
     
  10. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    ward is entitled to his opinion. i'm sure if he watched again...without the pac fans screaming ringside...he'd feel differently.
     
  11. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    My point exactly.....did you read my post?:huh
     
  12. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    As long as you have at least one half way decent eye and the mental capacity of a chimp.....no one is changing their minds on PAC dominating Tim. A ******ed Ray Charles could see that.
     
  13. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    pac/jmm 3....totally one sided in favor of jmm.

    pac/bradley....could have gone either way.
     
  14. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    i could do a round for round for u if u'd like. that fight was not one sided. i'll agree that pac won his rounds more convincingly...and i'll also say that i won't argue with a pac win but 11-1 is absurd. i scored it a draw with a few rounds that could have gone either way.

    watch it without the spin of lampley/lederman/compubox.
     
  15. Quincy K

    Quincy K Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,216
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    i would have much more respect for him if he gave back the belt, stopped with this bull**** about how he won the fight and get the **** out of that wheelchair.