[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRP9Geca45M[/ame] (Hopefully this hasn't been posted before -- I couldn't see a thread about it on the forum.)
I'll watch it later. Does Max really give his account of each round? I'd be very interested in hearing what he says as he was so close to the action
Kellerman explained it perfectly haha Not even questionable. Judges are either corrupt, stupid, bias or blind. They shouldn't be judging the fight. I think they should watch it at ringside - score it Then watch it on tape without commentary audio and rescore it Then come out with a conclusion 1 hour later (the fans could be entertained with an undercard fight) and the main fight would be schueduled 1 fight earlier. Judge who picked Rios over Abril who judged this fight shouldn't be allowed to judge again.... but they will.
Thank you for posting. Kellerman is spot on, Pacquiao won clearly. Those truly believing Bradley deserved the win should seek help.
"Round 3, Pacquiao won decisively" "Round 6, Pacquiao won decisively" "Round 7, Pacquiao won decisively" **** off Max Kellerman you bias cheer leading ****. They were the three closest rounds in the entire fight. I gave Bradley rounds 3 and 6.
Interesting perspective. He reiterates a point that I've been making to a lot of people - that a 11-1 or a 10-2 scorecard in Pac's favour, is perfectly reasonable. Highway robbery, for sure.
Not in 8 minutes he doesn't. It's basically a best of Pac edit. I want to see him explain the long silences in the fight when there was no commentary as Bradley was tagging Pac unanswered. It was eerily quiet without the three stooges chiming in! Manny had no boom boom!