Post your suggestion on how to avoid robbery..

:deal

 

Disappear judges.

 

Until there are stricter rules or an independant body choosing or controlling judges you wont get anywhere.

Bob arum no doubt put up 2 judges treated them well etc promised them future work and that is a huge flaw in the whole system these judges want to side with the decision that the main promoter wants.

Also there should be an age limit I cant help but wonder if the judges did it just because they are old and are like f it im gonna die soon I am going to give this fight to bradley just to be a ****

 

-Switch to 11 or 13 rounds for there is no draw.

-5 competent and experienced judges should be used and only 3 scorecards shall be randomly drawn after the fight and used to determine winner.

 

Do not allow fighters to sign long term contracts with Big Networks the moment you have that Lampley Merchant and Kellerman have no incentive in leading the viewer to believe something that isnt so.

The problem is not that this was a robbery, the problem is the networks made you think it was. why would they do that? HBO knows that if Manny were to lose that fight that it would make it even more difficult for them to cash in on their Mayweather Pacquiao mega showdown.

Why? because we know Floyd will not offer Manny **** with a loss and knowing this Manny wont take the fight HBO knows this they want that fight because that fight means Big bucks for their network there is no fighter bigger well there was no fight bigger.

Get rid of the network deals only allow Networks to contract the fight card not the fighter, that is a step in the right direction.

 

Its not rocket science, fire the judges if they cant do thier job.

 

with Top Rank, you'd need to kill your opponent, KO'ing him will give you only a draw

 

I dont care if Timothy Bradley's dad was commentating that fight, Bradley lost. But yeah I get what your saying with the networks, they can get out of line.

 

KO your opponent because there is no way these things will stop when human perception is involved with its tendency to inaccuracies.

 

Judges should be in a sound proof room or studio with access to multiple camera angles and have the ability to rewind footage.

 

Did the commentators make the ring side press & audience score it for Pacquiao too?

Did Merchant & Kellerman also do commentary at the same time in Spanish & for the UK too, because most people who saw those too had Pacman winning.

May be he just won in most peoples eyes?

Shocking thought indeed.

Just like he lost against Marquez the last time in many peoples eyes.

 

Have ex-boxers/fighters that have actually been inside a ring decide. Have Roy Jones, a Klitscko bro, Ray Leonard, Hagler, or Juan Diaz score a high profile fight. Fans will trust these guys because they'll tell it like it is. Make them take a lie detector test. Wont guarantee, but it'd help. It's too much coincidence 3 of Arum's last high profile fights have been controversial. Marquez-Pacquiao III, Rios-Abril, now Pacquiao-Bradley. Who does he think he's fooling? Lol, **** that. Every Arum fight now it's like Stevie Wonder is scoring now.

 

open scoring

 

They should make an elite panel of judges whose performance is continuously monitored. The panel should be limited and diverse. They did this in cricket and decisions went from 60-70% correct decision range to 96%.

 

Punish wildly off-base decisions with death. You f*ck up badly or take a bribe, you die.