The Ring didnt drop Manny,yet Dropped Hopkins after the Roy win and after Dawson

they didn't move floyd up. why would they drop pac when he absolutely dominated a prime, undefeated p4p fighter? marquez was not dropped either after the pac fight and hopkins looked **** against a shot jones.

 

atsch:rofl:rofl:roflatsch

Absoloutley dominated?

 

theyre just having a real tough time letting mannys nuts go

 

dominated?

Bradley SD Pac

:rofl:hi:

 

a bit hypocritical cos im sure they ran an article saying they wouldnt put JMM above manny even though they scored the fight for him because manny got the official verdict

 

Watch rounds 3 to 9 and come back to me. Or make a poll if you want.

 

That = Totally dominated? :rofl:rofl:rofl

Other rounds don't count?

Stick to Pacland mate, you fit in better.

 

yeah they count. did you gave it all to bradley? bradley won one clear round and maybe another close round. other than that, what did tim do? don't just believe me. watch the fight.

 

:rofl Oh bless you sweet heart.

I'll agree with you on 7-5 Pacquaio, but to say Bradley won 2 rounds is just stupid. We all know what side of the fence you sit on, and how biased your opinion is.

Your country was stupid enough to put all their stock in Pacquaio, a fighter who's been well matched and guided to the top by Arum. You were then stupid enough to elect him into congress despite him showing the common sense of a turnip. The man can't control his own finances, and has been involved in all manners of bad things outside the ring. Gambling, drinking, womanising, tax evasion, harbouring a fugative etc. Yet you all shut your eyes to it. Blinded by your faith because you have little else in the way of national icons.

Pacquauio's career is almost over, and soon you'll be left with nothing but a hard drive full of memories and another corrupt political figure who will feed you endless lines of rubbish while lining his own pockets. The flip side is that this one is not too bright, so you'll all just look even stupider.


P.S 7 - 5 is not a domination, not in anyones book. Marquez says karma is a *****.

 

What are you blabbering about? it's not my fault that a sliding pacquiaio still dominated:deal a prime p4p fighter. you are always a ***** so your opinion on this is tainted with agenda. even the other *****s saw bradley winning no more than 4 rounds. what's your full card?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

Marquez dominated Pacquaio sweetheart, Bradley gave him a damn good fight with no feet.

I'm always a *****? :rofl Let's search your post history and see how many non Pacquaio or Mayweather threads you pop up in shall we? Or howabout we take another look at your Pacland account? You're a moron.

You can have my full card tomorrow, it's almost 1am. I had it 7-5 Pac, and can see an argument for 6-6 Bradley.

 

How biased is what, Hopkins is 47 years old and he's a future HOF. How biased was Hopkins being dropped and not Manny? Well, maybe cause Hopkins is about to leave the game and still is praised by opponents and Manny is a top dog in these divisions around 140-147 and people who know better are looking into the future and know deep down that he can beat whoever he lost to while Hopkins can't beat Dawson...

 

Manny won very easily, and Hopkins only did that to avoid the beating he got when fought Dawson the second time.

 

6-6? 7-5 pac is an atrocious score let alone 6-6. stop watching fights with a ***** goggles mate.

 

This is why the only guy here who takes you seriously is Pejevan. :rofl Guess what you have in common.