Complete List of Scores from Boxing Writers/Experts/Fighters

Anything for Bradley?

 

People need to let this **** go. Paq got screwed on the cards or so it Looked. I couldn't watch that dreadful match again and really score it but doesn't even matter, what everyone should discussing is how bad paq has looked since testing has been brought into boxing. Steady decline and I mean he isn't elite, he solid and that's all.

 

i think u are misunderstanding what i am saying.

roth > dan rafael

...or most of the writers who have not been scoring boxing very long.

i'd place floyd sr and jeff over most judges and writers when it comes to understanding, but i saw an interview shortly after the fight with floyd sr. i have to say...he didn't look drunk...but he definitely looked and sounded like he was under the influence of some type of drug. also...i can't say he gets it right all the time because he thought lil' floyd lost to oscar! wtf was he watching???

as for jeff and lennox....i wonder if they watched the hbo feed or if they were there? i really think the audience has an influence over ppl more than they realize. again...i initially scored the bout 9-3 for pac. that was with rabid pac fans screaming in my ear...and i was listening to jim...and i was under the influence of alcohol. watching the replay sober without all the distractions...i score it a draw. i wonder if any of these guys have gone back and watched it without the distractions? would their scores be much different? i believe so. of course...u are going to have those who won't admit to being wrong because their egos won't let them. boxing is filled with egos.

i know plenty of ppl in boxing...and i have asked their scores. they all have similar...9-3, 10-2 blah,blah,blah...i've asked some of them to rewatch with the volume down. more than a few came back to me and said..."holy ****!!! i saw a totally different fight!!" most still thought pac won...but some switched completely and they were even embarrassed by it. i get it. so was i!!! it's human nature to give into group think. no one wants to be labeled a flip flopper. no one wants to be wrong. this all goes for the writers as well. do u know what that would do to the little credibility most of them have!? they won't jeopardize that. i'm just an anonymous poster. there's nothing to jeopardize. i don't have any hidden agendas or affiliations with either camp. i predicted a bradley win...i scored it a draw. i could see the fight being a win for pac. all i am saying is that the fight was close.

 

pacs not being tested....i don't believe he looks much different. the only thing that has changed over his last few fights is the opposition in front of him.

jmm and bradley were live opponents.

 

:roll:

 

U need to stop if u think the commisons testing protocol is up to par.

Real testing has been implemented the last 3 yrs

 

Do us a favor and post the same writers/experts list from
after the Marquez vs Pac fight. :think

 

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1595865

 

Thats a lot of 115-113 and 116-112 scores. Thats one and two round differences. Close fight. I had it 115-113 for Pac. There is no way Pac won rds 10,11,12. Absolutely no way. There are at least 3 swing rds that could have gone either way. Its easy to be swayed when one fighter(Pac) wins the last 30 seconds of a round. Look at DLH vs Mayweather. Every round DLH had a last 30 second rally trying to steal the rd. No ****in way was that a SD.

 

CJ Ross and Duane Ford box?

 

Okay, go find 100 who scored it for Bradley.