Boxing Has A Chance To Save Itself By Reversing Decision

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DogTheBountyMan, Jun 13, 2012.


  1. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    Let me refer you to Smokin Joe's avatar:

    This content is protected
     
  2. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
    What he said
     
  3. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    stop crying already you damn *****:|:|:|:|
     
  4. :hey
    Lets spar. :bbb
     
  5. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Not a chance.
    Pac lost this fight.
    The fight was very close with Pac looking very fatigued during the last 4 rounds.
    The 3 judges are among the best, know for their honesty and impartial judging.
    The biggest shame is people contesting this decision and undermining Bradley who fought a great fight.
    Reversing this decision is not going to happen.
    Get over it.
    Pac lost and isnt as good as people think.
    Their are others out there who would beat Pac alot worse.
     
  6. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,504
    3,696
    May 4, 2012
    Pacquiao/Bradley was not on Holyfield/Lewis or Whitaker/Chavez level. Chavez and Holy both hardly won 2 rounds.

    I had Pac/Bradley 8-4 for Pac, and Marquez/Pac III for Marquez 8-4. Stop it, you're getting "Close" mixed up with "competitive"
     
  7. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    If you stop crying.


















    And come down to Boston.
     
  8. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    And lets add this:


    This content is protected
     
  9. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Then they have to reverse the Marquez Pacquiao 3 decision
     
  10. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010



    This content is protected




    :deal
     
  11. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Your a dummy.

    Pacquiao Marquez was a clear robbery man. Marquez took 9 rounds out of 12 rounds.

    The polls on boxing forums support this. The polls for the Marquez Pacquiao 3 fight are right around what they are for the Pacquiao Bradley fight.

    It's just that your a ******* and you can't admit that Manny Pacquiao robbed Marquez in that 3rd fight.

    I had Pacquiao Marquez 3 9-3 for Marquez.

    I had Bradley Pacquiao the same way for Manny.

    So if they do reverse them, give Manny his rightful win and his rightful loss.

    Pacquiao Marquez 3 was not close by any means.

    This below is now you *******s but your too ****ing narrow viewed to admit it.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt0pXUT-Qyo[/ame]
     
  12. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    the *******s are trying to ignore that it's the SAME EXACT THING.

    They don't get that there weren't many close rounds at all in the Pac Marquez 3 fight.

    So Manny is 1-1 no matter how you look at it.

    Officially he is 1-1 in his last 2.

    Unofficially he is 1-1 in his last 2.

    Marquez beat that ****in ass *******s.
     
  13. Not cryin' will u show me around ? I always wanted to see Boston
     
  14. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005
    Reverse a decision? You're still dreaming, dude.
     
  15. cpnasty

    cpnasty Fight Fan 83 Full Member

    4,663
    5
    May 1, 2005

    Those 2 situations were different though. Whitaker and Lewis were facing their equals. Brad is no equal to Pac. Also, those decisions were draws, not wins.