atsch The majority of the world didn't watch the HBO feed nor did those at ringside, who, basically to a man, had Pac a comfortable winner. Keep hallucinating if that's what makes you happy.
So the decision is not controversial? **** out of here with this **** I had it 6-6 on first watch but only to counteract the hbo bias but when I rewatched it on primetime it was 7-5 in pacs favor
Exactly so get rid of it, Compubox isnt there for that reason its there for HBO to use as a tool to support their side of the lie.
I find people support compubox only went it suites their agenda. I'm impartial to compubox only because I don't need it to call a fight....some rely on it as if that is the end all be all.
Ok, we all know comp-u-box is an imperfect statistic and should be used as a tool and not the end all be all of a fight outcome. Even if the numbers were perfect, it doesn't measure the impact or damage done by each punch. But I haven't seen any evidence to go as far as saying they are intentionally padding these numbers out of some bias. And your video isn't supporting that case either. I watched it twice and I don't get why you can't count 20 something landed punches for Pac. You did watch past the first minute of the round right? You are counting jabs? Personally, throwing out the shots were both the angle was wrong and you couldn't see any reaction from Bradley, I still come out with Pac landing shots well into the 20's. And those shots clearly had more effect than Bradleys return fire. Saying that you can't count punches THROWN to 27 absolutely proves you are (A) biased beyond reason, or (B) totally blind. I counted landed shots in the 20's, and that was half of what he threw. Pac missed plenty.
If one guy lands some ***** ass shots that land on the gloves and arms, and another guy lands hard ass shots that **** a guy up, why should the guy that lands the ***** ass shots be given more credit? This is not amateur boxing. You might as well put the white stripe on their gloves and put them in headgear. Then the sport can ****in die because everyone will fight like Mike Jones and Cory Spinks. **** that.
clean punching- goes to bradley this round. he landed the cleaner punches and more of them. ring generalship- goes to bradley this round. he stood right in front of pac the whole round. defense- bradley again...he made pac miss most of his punches effective aggression- bradley...he backed pac up several times in this round. the killer in this round....lampley says at 2:39 "bradley landing more punches this round" then there was a pause....at which point the ppl in the control room reminded him...'we need to sell this as a pac win!!!' then he goes on to say...."oops, i read it wrong." hbo thinks the public is stupid. they are selling controversy where there is none. this fight was close and could have gone either way. bradley won at the very minimum 4 to 5 rounds. several rounds could have gone either way. this round was not one of them. tripped out part....i gave pac this round when i scored it a draw.
And thats my ****ing point this was not a robbery at all, if you had 7-5 for Pac okay but you cant even argue it was a clear 7-5 for either guy. So how the **** can you sit back and cry robbery?
I remember watching it and thinking wtf is up with paq then I remember the weigh in, soft body and @147 . He really didn't do **** the whole fight neither did bradley, such a boring and very low level match it was. I might have to torture myself and watch it again and really score it. I thought 8/4 paq was good for me but that was with hbo's clowns drilling it in my head that paq is a beast in there and killing Bradley. Obviously they were both tentative, both slow, both tired 2nd part of fight which makes me wonder wtf as up. Its not like they war'd for the 1st half to tire themselves, they didn't do what. No matter what paq is the draw and he should had won, both sucked but he won a few rounds so he should have won.