Compubox HBO Lies

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bazooka, Jun 14, 2012.


  1. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    :good
     
  2. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Hold that thought let me upload a short Biased Clip for ya brb
     
  3. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    If "Bang Bang" hadn't had Pac's dick in his mouth this controversy wouldn't exist.
     
  4. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    unfiltered truth.
     
  5. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    :patsch The majority of the world didn't watch the HBO feed – nor did those at ringside, who, basically to a man, had Pac a comfortable winner.

    Keep hallucinating if that's what makes you happy.
     
  6. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    So the decision is not controversial? **** out of here with this **** I had it 6-6 on first watch but only to counteract the hbo bias but when I rewatched it on primetime it was 7-5 in pacs favor
     
  7. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    Exactly so get rid of it, Compubox isnt there for that reason its there for HBO to use as a tool to support their side of the lie.
     
  8. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    I find people support compubox only went it suites their agenda. I'm impartial to compubox only because I don't need it to call a fight....some rely on it as if that is the end all be all.
     
  9. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    Ok, we all know comp-u-box is an imperfect statistic and should be used as a tool and not the end all be all of a fight outcome. Even if the numbers were perfect, it doesn't measure the impact or damage done by each punch. But I haven't seen any evidence to go as far as saying they are intentionally padding these numbers out of some bias. And your video isn't supporting that case either.

    I watched it twice and I don't get why you can't count 20 something landed punches for Pac. You did watch past the first minute of the round right? You are counting jabs? Personally, throwing out the shots were both the angle was wrong and you couldn't see any reaction from Bradley, I still come out with Pac landing shots well into the 20's. And those shots clearly had more effect than Bradleys return fire.

    Saying that you can't count punches THROWN to 27 absolutely proves you are (A) biased beyond reason, or (B) totally blind. I counted landed shots in the 20's, and that was half of what he threw. Pac missed plenty.
     
  10. Diamond Eye

    Diamond Eye Guest

    If one guy lands some ***** ass shots that land on the gloves and arms, and another guy lands hard ass shots that **** a guy up, why should the guy that lands the ***** ass shots be given more credit?

    This is not amateur boxing. You might as well put the white stripe on their gloves and put them in headgear.

    Then the sport can ****in die because everyone will fight like Mike Jones and Cory Spinks.

    **** that.
     
  11. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    clean punching- goes to bradley this round. he landed the cleaner punches and more of them.

    ring generalship- goes to bradley this round. he stood right in front of pac the whole round.

    defense- bradley again...he made pac miss most of his punches

    effective aggression- bradley...he backed pac up several times in this round.

    the killer in this round....lampley says at 2:39 "bradley landing more punches this round" then there was a pause....at which point the ppl in the control room reminded him...'we need to sell this as a pac win!!!' then he goes on to say...."oops, i read it wrong."

    hbo thinks the public is stupid. they are selling controversy where there is none. this fight was close and could have gone either way. bradley won at the very minimum 4 to 5 rounds. several rounds could have gone either way. this round was not one of them. tripped out part....i gave pac this round when i scored it a draw. :lol:
     
  12. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    7-5 for pac isn't a bad score. no one is saying it is.

    11-1 or 10-2 is pure bull**** though.
     
  13. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    cover ur diamond eye and watch that round again.
     
  14. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    And thats my ****ing point this was not a robbery at all, if you had 7-5 for Pac okay but you cant even argue it was a clear 7-5 for either guy.

    So how the **** can you sit back and cry robbery?
     
  15. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    I remember watching it and thinking wtf is up with paq then I remember the weigh in, soft body and @147 . He really didn't do **** the whole fight neither did bradley, such a boring and very low level match it was.

    I might have to torture myself and watch it again and really score it. I thought 8/4 paq was good for me but that was with hbo's clowns drilling it in my head that paq is a beast in there and killing Bradley. Obviously they were both tentative, both slow, both tired 2nd part of fight which makes me wonder wtf as up. Its not like they war'd for the 1st half to tire themselves, they didn't do what. No matter what paq is the draw and he should had won, both sucked but he won a few rounds so he should have won.