Sir manny didnt start punching until the round was nearly at the mid way mark but I see how you *******s see the fight Manny is so fast you dont see him throwing I get it
Great thread, but......., why are people counting Mannys numbers for round 7 when Bradley were the numbers that were clearly inaccurate in that round, and landed far more shots than Manny
Since when??? People throw vertical punches all the time so does Manny. They are not feints. You would be surprised how much power you can generate with a vertical punch, especially at close range.
Not even true at all the media was not that split, infact Most had it for Marquez or a draw very few had it for Pac
That's what listed on boxrec. But I don't understand your argument. You say we need to respect the judges scores for Pac-Bradley and ignore the overwhelming opinion that Pac won that fight. However, when it comes to JMM-Pac 3 you don't agree with the judges and favor the media, even though the media scores were much more varied for the JMM-Pac 3. This is the same thing you accuse the *******s of doing.
I dont agree with the judges But I still have to live with it, where was the investigation for this hearing? Why is Pacquiao so special that he gets an investigation when he is "Victim" to a close questionable decision? while others who have fallen victim have not got any type of investigation?
Because he is a superstar and one of the few boxers who have crossed over into the mainstream and in addition he is Bob Arum's prize and Bob Arum probably has more influence in the boxing game than anyone else. So he gets the special treatment.
No sir boxing does not need that, that is not what this sport is about nobody should get more or less benefits from the system. This is boxing, its your responsibility to make it clear you won the fight and since you failed to make it clear now you want to cry robbery and act like Paris Hilton in full on ***** mode get ****ing real. Next time Pacquiao should have a better game plan train harder so he can fight for a full 3 mins each round, and get better sparring Partners none of those guys could even simulate bradleys style.
I counted 58 punches. I mightve missed about 3 or 4 punches give or take. So saying Manny landed 27 would suggest a little above 50% accuracy ratio. THAT is bull****. But he did throw more than you're suggesting.
I didnt see him throwing as many as you guys have, he didnt start working until nearly half the round was up, I counted 32, leaving your right hand out to measure a fighter is not a shot thrown neither is a feint with the right hook and he did that quite a bit in that round. Either way the point I am making is there is no way he landed 27 shots in that round especially by the time we hit the 30 second mark.
As another poster said it best, If someone of Manny's stature can get robbed on a grand stage in Vegas no less...then a fair shake doesn't exist at all. It's one thing if the hometown fighter got the questionable decision because he's in his hometown, but if the hometown fighter gets robbed in his own backyard there's something seriously wrong here. Blame the system, Bob Arm, the state of Nevada...whatever...point is...it just makes boxing truly the most corrupt sport there is. That is a HORRIBLE reputation to have. We have robberies on the grand stage, lower stages and the olympics. We have juiced up fighters. We have fighters allowed to duck other fighters. Too much power in the promoters. This is making the sport almost impossible to watch. We don't want to add to the list.
That was about a quarter of Bradley's punch stats then. Manny hardly did that anyways. I counted punches that were thrown with a fully extended elbow. Jabs and power shots total. To say you only counted 32 is ****in' funny because your bias is showing more and more. You ALWAYS have a bias either against Manny or in favor of a hispanic fighter. You sir are a Mexitard. Try to remain neutral. :good