Jack Dempsey says Max Baer was possibly the GOAT

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by manbearpig, Jun 12, 2012.

  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,803
    Likes Received:
    9,999
    I never saw Louis stunned even for a second. I also do not consider Baer an elite fighter .. a high ranked fighter for the time but he was closer to a wild amateur than a polished pro ... he won his fights through superior size ( for the time ) and power ... his style was made for sharp, hard puncher with speed ..
     
  2. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    664
    The best punch Max Baer landed on Joe Louis was just before the bell ended the first (or was it second?) round. A massive shot, Baer's classic overhand wallop, but it obviously didn't hit Louis in the right spot. It knocked him back and bounced him off the ropes though. And then the bell went.
     
  3. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    33
    none of the baer footage i've seen indicates elite skills. however, he obvious power, stamina and chin. it takes you damn far...imagine shavers with the ability to fight 15 rounds and take a punch?
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,966
    Likes Received:
    27,945
    Max Baers failure to fulfill his potential was not just down to his poor work ethic. The death of Frankie Campbell ruined him as a fighter. Prior to that he was realy nasty and prety consistent, although he had a tendency to get frustrated and loose by DQ.

    It is after the Campbell fight that he becomes inconsistant and the clowning starts. After this he starts to loose to fighters he ought to be able to demolish. He kind of gets his act back together, and puts toggether a winning streak that ends in him holding the title, despite his still verry real issues. After this Dempsey and others, think/hope that he has finaly turned the corner.

    The rest is history. He looses his title to Braddock and has other setbacks. Eventualy he realises that the clock is ticking and gets his act together. He enjoys a series of wins over top contenders, and looks set to challenge Joe Louis for the title. Ultimately he is old too soon and wise too late, and Lou Nova retires him.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  5. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,432
    Likes Received:
    33
    i'll take a look at whatever earlier, baer material is readily available. everything i've seen is from around the carnera fight and after and he doesn't look like much
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,966
    Likes Received:
    27,945
    Baer did have some interesting skills. He became prety good at countering the jab for example, which is a key reason why he beat Carnera.

    I think he looks most impresive on film late in his career, when he knows that the clock is ticking e.g Pat Comitskey fight.

    In some ways the most impresive thing about Baer, is the fact that he was so naturaly talented, that he could act like a goofball against world class opponents and still somehow get away with it!
     
  7. sugarkills

    sugarkills Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    19
    Jack Dempsey is wrong because Joe Louis beat the **** out of Max Baer, regardless if Max killed or had poor work ethic.
     
  8. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    664
    I think Dempsey said it about a year before Joe Louis even turned pro.
     
  9. sugarkills

    sugarkills Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,401
    Likes Received:
    19
    Regardless, I think there are too many other great heavyweights in history that were better then Max Baer to make him "possibly" the GOAT.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,966
    Likes Received:
    27,945
    At that stage, he has just won the title, beaten the best two fighters in the world (Schmeling and Carnera), and would presumably kill Braddock if some sicko sanctioned the fight.

    The competition is Sullivan, Jeffries, Johnson, Dempsey.

    Would it be unthinkable at that stage that you might be seing the start of something big?
     
  11. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    134
    No it's not. He's in comparison with the whole history, not just the heavyweight one in Dempsey's statement.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,966
    Likes Received:
    27,945
    Perhaps you are being a bit hard on Dempsey over what might have been a throwaway statement, for the cameras, in the heat of the moment, cynicaly motivated by promotion considerations.

    And at the end of it all, what is your point?
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    4,032
    he could potentially be seen as a potential GOAT at that time in history, in the same way people spoke of Tyson as being the next coming when he was 21.

    With hindsight, Tyson is nowhere near the GOAT, but it certainly felt like he was going there in 1982.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  14. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    134
    Your proof that all comments made on fighters by peers/'experts' aren't like this, is?
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,966
    Likes Received:
    27,945
    A lot of them are, but there is usualy a grain of truth behind the worst of them.

    While you should not agree with this comment, you should absolutely try to understand why Dempsey said it.

    If it does not change your opinion, then it will at least give you some fascinating insights into the era!