you are right and that was my point not always does landing the heavier shots mean you won , But again lets not pretend like this was not a close fight either, I honestly fail to see how Floyd won more rounds in that fight, the rematch resolved this matter as would with Bradley vs Pac. also your 9-9 round that is just disgusting that was a clear round for Castillo and with a point taken from Floyd you know that makes it a 10-8 round.
Both fighters lost a point the round in which Floyd lost a point Castillo IMO won not sure the exact round as I dont keep fights on a Rolodex
I think you are talking about round 10. Round 8 is when Castillo lost a point. I thought Floyd won the 10th pretty clearly. Castillo didn't really start to come on until after Floyd was deducted a point.
lol, why are you back here? We all know you did not see the damn fight . . . unless you just watched it.
Yeah because history has shown us the commentators are always right on point and compubox is gods gift to boxing:-(
You guys who try to use compubox as evidence are idiots. Compubox is two jokers sitting ringside, on one side of the ring, tabulating what they thought they saw land through one of the boxer's bodies. It is often not even close to the reality of what actually landed in the ring.
The 8th round of this Jose fight is a perfect illustration of this. Floyd boxed well with his jab, but Jose was the one that landed some hard shots, on the body.
just recently watch this fight had mayweather winning the first 5 rounds and round 10 and 11 the rounds castillo won seemed more 1 sided thats why alot of people think he won, had it 6 rounds for floyd 4 for castillo and 2 even giving the point reductions
Close fight.....no way was this a robbery. It was like Pac vs JMM 3......the fight was compeitive but the outcome wasn't the popular decison. I had JMM beating Pac by 2 rounds.....I had JLC beating Floyd by 2.....but I wasn't upset or surprised to see the official decison for either.