Anyone believe Adamek beat Chambers?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by john garfield, Jun 16, 2012.


  1. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    so far reports are mostly agreeing with the scores for Adamek. ex: espn, the scene, etc
    (although i see michael wood and jeff meyer disagree)
     
  2. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009
    I gave Chambers round 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and round

    I had 115-113 for Chambers.
     
  3. Danmann

    Danmann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,427
    20
    Oct 30, 2011
    I felt it could have gone either way. I think Chambers had a lot of people (including me) wanting him to get decision for fighting one-armed. I would rather Chambers had gotten it, but it was not a robbery. Chambers still comes out looking bitter than Adamek, his effort will bring him good attention, meanwhile Adamek barley beat guy fighting 11 rounds with one arm.
     
  4. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Adamek sucks at HW....

    Its time for him to retire
     
  5. Jаck

    Jаck P4P King Full Member

    773
    0
    Mar 4, 2012

    So does Chambers. These two have no future at HW.
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,468
    15,777
    Jul 19, 2004
  7. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    it was a ****ing a pathetic performance from adamek. how can you win by being sloppy as a drunk bar fighter!!! never saw a fighter win by landing 13% in my life....disgraceful!! eddie won 117-111 and with 1 arm! this was a bigger robbery than pac vs bradley. apperantly all you have to do now is throw a million punches and doesn't matter if you land and look silly missing and doesn't even matter if the person you're fighting lands 1 third of his punches and lands over 25 more punches!! BS!!!! If someone's at 13% and the other's at 33% and they land the same then the muther****er at 35% should win!!! and in this case the dude landing 50% more accurately actually landed much more punches!!!

    aggression only counts if it's effective not if you're missing all night. this was a disgrace.
     
  8. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
  9. SomeGuy101

    SomeGuy101 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    0
    Oct 16, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  10. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Bigger robbery than Pac Bradley yet you had Bradley winning that fight.

    You are comparing 13% to 35% but % doesnt matter. Its the number of landed punches that matter and ring generalship, who controls the action. Adamek landed 13% but he threw twice as many punches and its not like he missed all those punches, many were blocked or partially blocked, which also counts and has effect on the opponent. Chambers faded in the last round because of those punches he absorbed on hands, arms ect.
     
  11. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Adamek fails to impress once again.
     
  12. Woodworm

    Woodworm Member Full Member

    324
    0
    Jul 25, 2010
    I just watched it and scored it 116-112 Chambers.
     
  13. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010
    Adamek won a close UD, for me 115:113

    Next, Chisora wins against Toevid Haye than we can see that Vitali fought better opponents than Wlad!
     
  14. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    116-112 Adamek, doesn't change the fact that he looked horrible in the fight, if Eddie had two healthy hands he'd win for sure
     
  15. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010
    why chambers was able to make pressure in round 10, if he was injured?

    chmabers is not a fighter like adamek or povetkin.