*******s are like girly fans of boybands. They are too young, and too stupid to watch fights with the sound muted. Any real fight fan always watches fights with no sound, probably because they are both old and knowledgable enough not to give a **** what some TV cretin, or retired fighter thinks.
i had tim up by 2 rds and i watched the fight twice and scored the same both times , glad to see pppl realizing tim didn't get blown away.
obsessed? you're the one obsessed with me following my every post. where is you full card? still cannot find enough rounds for bradley? did you even watched it? tim didn't do anything aside form being more active with the jab that didn't hit pac. 4 to 5 solid shots at the end of the round compared to jabs that htis pac's pac's gloves. you are better off arguing other rounds for bradley than this one.
Just because you right alot of biased skewered nonsense doesnt change the facts. First two minutes Bradley is controlling the pace and landed two combinations of body and head shots and Pac landed about two shots and was hitting air. How can you call that even. Are you really saying Pac outlanded Bradley in those first two minutes and was controlling the pace?
The closest round in the entire fight. See people, without commentary it is much easier to see who wins. When I watched it without commentary I gave Bradley rounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11 and 12. The rest went to Pacquiao. 7 and 3 could go either way IMO.
i basically put all the punches in that round and you're still in denial? i need to pause and rewind it to see it clearly. point me where did tim landed a body and head combo shot in that round? are you counting tim's jabs that are landing on pac's guard?
two and i'm watching rounds one at a time to disprove idiots who claim rounds for bradley like round 7. so why are you commenting on a fight that you still haven't seen mate? :huh
That I haven't seen? :rofl What did you think of Lee vs Chavez last night? Do you agree with the stoppage in Munroe vs Quigg? :rofl:rofl:rofl Quick, jump on to google.
i have not seen both. i have no television and i'm not aware if this fight is covered in my area. though i'm happy that chavez jr. got the win. why are you acting like a ******? commenting on a fight that you did not see?
The first time I watched the fight I gave only one round to Bradley. After the replay, tho, it could if easily been a draw. Round 7 I had Bradley landing 21 punches to Pacman's 12. HBO commentators, compubox (which is still human operated), and the crowd biased as hell. A friend had Pacman by a point, I had Bradley by a point. Again, like in the Marquez fight, Pacman simply doesn't land as many punches as they make it seem. Bradley displayed very good defense. He knew when to box on the outside and do something many didn't think was possible, fight Manny on the inside and attack the body. Hatton was expected to do that, but got ktfo. Excellent gameplan and execution by Bradley.
Puga scored JMM PAC 3 7-5 to Pac, enough said. My pac bradley scorecard is: 1: 10-9 pac 2: 10-9 pac 3: 10-9 pac 4: 10-9 pac 5: 10-9 pac 6: 10-9 pac 7: 10-9 pac 8: 10-9 tim 9: 10-9 pac 10: 10-9 tim 11: 10-9 tim 12: 10-9 tim 8-4 pac 116-112
Maybe cancel your internet and buy a TV mate, you can then educate yourself on some Boxing, and leave all of us alone.
the hypocrisy of these *******s is astounding, the stuff they were saying to give pac rounds against jmm they now disagree with