This content is protected Alan Rubenstein's score doesn't need a comment, everyone knows how ******ed it was the others more or less tell the story of the fight thoughts?
Adamek was in need of the judges help to beat an one armed fighting Chambers. That´s the story of the fight.
Eddie could have won if he threw more but didn't and lost himself the fight. Another impresive name on Ademek record.
I could definitely see the fight for Chambers though I had it 7-5 against him. ******ed card is ******ed. Robbery shouts also ******ed.
The biggest thing that sticks out is the 1st round. How they could give that to Adamek is beyond me. I can also understand how they could view it as Adamek coming on late in the fight, but how all 3 could have it 5-1 after 6 rounds is more than just a little surprising. I had it 116-112 Chambers, and view it as a very generous hometown decision as opposed to a robbery. But it certainly seems that Adamek was going to get the W provided he kept his workrate up, effective or otherwise.
This wasn't a robbery. You don't win a fight by throwing slaps and don't have the same workrate as your opponent.
Eddie threw bunch of right hands.. And hurt Adamek.. Had him walking back... Adamek threw bunch of slaps at Eddie gloves and air.. Fact!
You do when said "slaps" bloody your opponent and drive him backwards for half the fight, and when you land more with said "slaps" than your opponent in spite of his high workrate. LOL @ the clowns giving Adamek the fight for missing a bunch of punches. He did some nice body work, but Chambers clearly landed more clean shots. I don't even know how it's debatable. Frankly, I'm getting bored with debating fights. People show up here and try to argue that up is down just to justify their biases.
Same score I had. . . I thought Flores did ok - he had 115-113 Chabmers too. I felt there was a few rounds that were close enough to where you could make an argument for Adamek, though. . . Unofficially, you have to take into account Chambers fighting with one arm. . . But officially, you can't take that into account when scoring.