Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery (A MUST WATCH)

Someone needs to throw that video up on Mannys facebook Max Kellermans and HBOs

 

I just watched a bit more and this is a genuinely terrible video. Quite clearly biased.

 

Dude seriously if Pacquiao hit Bradley that many times which was more that Marquez more than Mosley he would have swelling maybe not worse but he would have some serious swelling especially when you consider HBO had given the edge to him in Power Punches thrown and landed.

Sorry but this Video exposes what 7% of the viewers saw and exposes how easily 91% of the viewers can be fooled

 

Look at Bardleys face after the Abregu fight, quite swollen up.

 

So thats why Bradley didn't have a mark on him while Pac's face was all marked up?

 

Even Manny's body reaction after him missing you can see it.. This is why so many people had Pac winning the whole fight,boxing takes a keen eye when you see a guy that fast,it even fooled me watching it live..

 

How so nobody other than Lampley and Kellerman and the HBO team are speaking ohhh I get it you see that the fight was biased in favor of Pacquiao....

Jack it is what it is... HBO was all over Pacquiaos balls that night

 

True,but Manny usually gets credit based on the other guys face 'Juan" being more bruised etc.. when it comes to Pac,it's null and void..

 

I think the problem with this video is that it seems to be supporting an amateur point system perspective since they seem to imply that TB was effective with his feather shots. Anyone with half a brain heard HBO's knob slobbing including Jim's blatant horrendous calling during the fight. This isn't some new phenomenon with them. With that said I gave the fight to Pac somewhat comfortably, but admit that I wanted to go back and rewatch since I felt of was seeing and hearing two different things sometimes. Didn't do a R by R but I was of the impression that Pac won on most effective shots. I believe you have to beat the champ in order to take the belt and I don't think Tim really did that with his ineffective shots. I have yet to watch it again.

 

good video. but i've watched it and i have watched a lot of boxing in my years. pacquiao still won the fight. not 11-1 though and compubox is always bs.

 

atsch

Yet the commentary ain't.

 

Except the people on-site also thought it was a robbery.
Except out of all the countless writers on-site, not even 10% had it for Bradley, and the overwhelming majority dictate a 8-4 to 10-2 score sheet in favor of Pac.
Except even Timothy "I need to watch the tape first" Bradley knew he lost.

Please make it harder to own you *****s next time.

 

The guy is not saying that bradley won the fight, he simply saying that HBO crew was ****ing bias and slurping all over pac dick all night, completely ignoring what effective work bradley was doing whether it be defensive or offensive.:hi:

 

Lampley repeatedly crediting Pac with shots that did NOT land was what this video was about, and it give clear numerous examples of the poor commentary.

 

Great video... And that's the reason I had Bradley winning 7-5.... PAc as usual was missing on the majority of his combinations.. Bottom line it was a close fight... And neither guy dominated mainly because PAC couldn't land clean punches and Bradley has no power