Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery (A MUST WATCH)

HBO bias towards Pac was more than compensated for by the judges bias towards Bradley.

 

So the whole point of this video is to "expose" HBO's crew and NOT legitimize Bradley's win?

1) We knew that since the "bang bang bang" shenanigan.
2) Everybody, including you, is using this video to legitimize your **** 115-113 score cards when even the people on site had it at at least 8-4.

Again, please make it harder to own you next time.:hi:

 

done...........

 

I never seen people judge the fight on the fact 'Tim doesn't hit hard" so if a guy is winning a round,but the other guy connects 1-2 hard shots he wins the round? Well if your name is Manny that's how its judged...

When Juan had the better punches,that didn't count but instead gave it to Manny for 'effective aggression".... Lets put aside who we think won,and focus on the biased HBO commentary which swayed most people watching the fight..

 

Seriously, how old are you and Bazooka? 13?

Let's post a video on Facebook and change the world! Woopeeedoo! :nut

 

I was waiting for someone to say this. I thought I was the only who thinks this way after that PAC/Bradley fight. Bradley was the challenger, which means he has to beat the champ in order for him to take that position.

 

I'm confused, so before the fight they were nuthugging Bradley. Than during the fight, for "no apparent reason" they decided to nuthug Pacquiao? You ****ers just hate for the sake of hating.

 

people should stfu until they watch the video

 

You could have that tape running 24 /7 for a year, on the biggest screen possible in Times Square, and there is not a ******* on this planet with the intelligence to understand what their eyes are actually seeing.

The sooner everyone else understands that *******s, and their opinions are totally worthless, the better boxing forums will become. Just ignore the dickheads.

 

Well I thought Pac won clearly but no doubt hbo can be biased ****s some times. 119-109 was too wide a score and I still remember the Alexander kotelnik highway robbery that they bought into.

 

Good work son:good

Are you serious? here on ESB we only get a fraction of the *******s, Facebook they all gather to make death threats towards Tim its a universal outlet to those who tried to sell this bull**** to the public

Why go forum to forum exposing them when you can simply slap all of them in one sweep?

 

Yeah, right...
I wish people thought that way when Sturm was fighting DLH...
What you guys really want is a superstar-bonus.
Bradley was by far the more aggressive fighter, his defense was superior, he controlled the pace of the fight.
And I don't care what Compubox is telling you, Bradley landed more clean shots than Pacquiao.
What else is he supposed to do if I may ask?
Does every challenger have to knock out the Champion in order to get his belt from now on?
What about we award the belt to the person that actually fought the better fight instead of discrediting his performance, repeat the fairytales that HBO told us and cry foul?
how would that be for a change?

 

Some people need to get a life ....come on guys. You can't defend this ****.

 

I don't get what you were trying to explain here. You just said that you saw Pac won clearly but then you think HBO is biased for giving that score? Then what do you think about the judges who had Bradley winning the fight?

So which one is biased? 115-113 Bradley or 119-109 Pac?

 

Go away and learn boxing, you don't judge a fight on anything other than a round by round basis. You know you have a spectacular ****** when they mention this old line.

Great video by the way, makes me appreciate my keen eye that saw all those punches missing live and seeing the fight in Bradley's favour. HBO are a disgrace. Somebody should post that to Bradley's twitter or whatever he uses.