Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery (A MUST WATCH)

I didn't say a KO is needed. You can still beat the guy without KO'ing him. What I'm saying is, ATLEAST prove or just show that you are beating the champ. A close fight with a champ USUALLY not enough to get the belt, but I have no problem giving it to the challenger if it's really that close.

On that fight (Pac/Bradley), on your own view, how did the fight go? Was it decisive win for Bradley? If you have Bradley winning the fight, can you please tell me what rounds did you see Bradley winning so we can analyze you point.

 

Good to see you are not biased and don't form an opinion after 22 seconds of a 15 minute video. Then two minutes later confirm your opinion of bias.atsch

 

it was a close fight and the Champion no where in the rules automatically gets the benefit of the doubt on the score cards in close rounds.
I had it 7-5 for Bradley on fight night rewatching it I can add the 4th round to Bradley which could make for an 8-4 score for Bradley.
he did enough to win, and Manny in my eyes did not do enough to defend his title.

*******s are absent from this thread and there is good reason, the author of this video, is a huge Pacquiao fan, and they know it, he has in the past under other accounts made Videos to expose the HBO biased in favor of Mayweather.

Today they woke up and saw that he exposed this fight, and that doesnt sit to well with the pac fans....

its quite obvious by now, there is no way you can even state that HBO was not sitting on Mannys dick and pedaling his balls. They were all over Mannys sack

 

You may probably know boxing better than me but how can someone not know who won a fight? If it was a close fight, then a knowledgable LIKE YOU will be able to sort things out and decide. But come on dude...really...how many times did Bradley had a upper hand against Pac that night? Tell me which atleast which rounds Bradley won so I can educate myself (since I'm good at good at that).

 

Fights are not scored on specific punches dude, and if you want an honest break down of rounds for Tim
I gave Tim
Rounds 1,2&3 I gave Tim the 7th and I gave him 10,11,12

The fourth round could easily go to Tim as well.

 

I scored it 115-114 for Bradley, but sorry, I cant rewatch the fight now to tell you what exact rounds I gave him.
I remember giving him the first 2 and 2 or 3 of the last 3 though, I think there were like 3 really close rounds in between of which I gave 1 to Bradley, 1 to Pacquiao, and 1 even.
By the way, scoring this fight I felt I was being a bit generous towards Manny in the middle rounds, bc most of the time he was pretty inactive for the majority of the round, and when he started to throw, he wasnt really landing that much. But Bradley did not enough to win those rounds himself, so I gave the majority of the middle rounds to Pac.
So that kinda was a little bit of a Champions-bonus right there.
A 116-112 Bradley in my eyes would be more acceptable than a 116-112 Pacquiao by the way.
Bradleys defensive effort gets highly underrated in this fight. The fight was fought at a pace Bradley dictated, and in my eyes Bradley landed more clean shots than Pacquiao.
Pacquiaos shots might have been more "effective" (although that even is a stretch when you look at Bradleys face after the bout), but that is just 1 criteria, Bradley had the other 3 nailed down imo.
I just couldnt find more than 5 rounds to give to Pac based on these 4 criteria, and like I said, at that time I even felt I was being generous towards Pac.

 

Someone should have beat the **** out of Lampley during the Bowe- Golota riots.

 

Honestly Neither guy did enough to win but Bradley was better at the end. There were about 3 clear Manny rounds, 2 Clear Bradley rounds and 7 rounds that could've been scored either way, this is a tough loss for Pac and his fans but NOT a robbery, a robbery is Martinez vs Cintron.

 

Good video. More like it would be nice. HBO are a joke, and Compubox is utter bollocks.

If this was anyone other than Pacquiao, 'robbery' wouldn't have been mentioned.

Lampley expected Pacquiao to blow Bradley away and thus saw what he wanted in the fight, i.e. punches landing that didn't even come close.

 

great video exposing lampley for the blind idiot that he is

 

Just goes to show how tim did actually win the fight and shuts all the ****ing idiots up who think pac won a wide UD.

IF you think pac won by wide UD then YDKSAB!

 

This isn't Olympic boxing; it's not a punch-point system. Clearly in respects to boxing fight judgement "effectiveness" in any capacity is subjective. Do I think Pac got lazy and took parts of rounds off...yes. Do I think TB landed more solid shots on Pac...Yes. Do I think TB slipped a lot of Manny's punches throughout the fight...Yes. Do I think TB's landing of solid feather punches on Pac were enough to take the belt...No, though I have to carefully watch the fight again to be sure.

 

beautiful video!!! i have to say that is the best i've seen yet.

 

it's statements like these i take issue with. how do u know those punches were feather punches?

obviously they were enough to stop pac in his tracks and keep him from coming foward. u don't have to be a harder puncher to win a fight.