Is Floyd really bigger than Manny??cause i dont think so

He is clearly an alt.:rofl

 

You seem to be on this forum today for some time, so surely enough for you to type a rational and logical response to my challenging post. If not google is an amazing tool and should be able to point you towards relevant material on this sure to be "well known and documented" developmentally significant variable.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

How can people argue with the evidence in front of their eyes??!??? nut:nut

 

Yeah, Popkins or Lance uppercut I reckon. Both DKSAB

 

No, genetics equals more room for growth. Anything exogenously induced and exceeding the genetic limits are not included. First off, your silly categorization of "bigger" is ambiguous and likely intentional. Secondly, I'd like for you to point me in the direction of one study that showed standard and linear correlation between bone length and growth potential. There is a reason why tribesman in parts of the African continent are ectomorphic and despite their great skeletal dimensions, would pale in comparison to overall mass of other Euro-Asiatic originating people.

Just because you've competed in BB since 16 does not correlate to you knowing what you are talking about. In fact, it more likely correlates to you know a lot about anecdotal evidence and little about actual physiological theory and practice or what the possible causes are for your faulty assessment of said evidence.

 

Yeah I'm either Popkins or Lance according to *****s. Take your pick

 

Don't know who you are. Your an alt though.

You mentioned something Turbo said before you were even on this forum.

No respect to you alt.:hi:

 

Check my posts dumbass, then you'd know why :hi:

 

Huh...:huh Shane looks bigger at the shoulders man. The **** this guy on?atsch

You do realize this is a weigh in pic. Of course they weigh the ****in same or right around it at the weigh in.atsch Floyd as 146 and Shane was 147 if I remember right.

On fight night, Shane looked about 160-162

Floyd about 150-152.

 

**** you. Your an alt and I don't respect you *****.:hi:

 

Like I said before, compare the physical measurements. I've done it and they are even almost, with a slight favor to Floyd. That means, wrist, fists, thighs, calfs, waist, chest, arms. Where Floyd exceeds Pac is behind and vice versa.

 

genetics will take you only so far. You can't build a 8 bedroom house on a 4 bedroom frame. Look at the pics posted abouve of the manny and shane comparison an it tells you all you need to know. good day to you brah. moving on

 

If Floyd told these idiots he had a longer beard than Pacquiao, this forum would be full of threads agreeing with it. **** reality, **** logic, **** truth, just... Floyd. That's all that matters...

 

lol

 

they're both welterweights. they were both flyweights at age 17.

they're roughly the same size. I would say Floyd is slightly bigger thus able to be more competetive vs the 154 pounders but the difference is so small it's almost insignificant. bone structure etc....something Floyd beats Manny in size with like reach and somethings Manny beats Floyd with like fists size etc....

It's fair to say they're roughly the same size since the difference is so minimal. They both weigh the same on fight night and have for ages