MAX KELLERMAN Breaks Down PACQUIAO VS. BRADLEY Round by Round...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BleedingEdge, Jun 19, 2012.

  1. BleedingEdge

    BleedingEdge Guest

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuguFMN-8l8[/ame]
     
  2. BleedingEdge

    BleedingEdge Guest

    Summary

    Round 1 (indecisive) - Bradley (by a hair)

    Round 2 (indecisive) - Pacquiao (by a hair)

    Round 3 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 3 to Bradley")

    Round 4 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 4 to Bradley")

    Round 5 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 5 to Bradley")

    Round 6 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 6 to Bradley")

    Round 7 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 7 to Bradley")

    Round 8 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give round 8 to Bradley")

    "All Pacquiao has to do is win one more decisive round, and you cannot even give Bradley a draw!!!"

    Round 9 (decisive) - Pacquiao ("There is no way you can give it to Bradley. Fight over.")

    Round 10 (decisive) - Bradley ("The only round absolutely no one can give to Pacquiao.")

    Round 11 (indecisive) - Bradley

    Round 12 (indecisive) - Bradley

    8-4 Pacquiao
     
  3. Max,Dan,Emannuel picked Bradley.
     
  4. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    9,698
    Likes Received:
    870
    I had the same damn scorecard. I can't stand Kellerman either.
     
  5. BleedingEdge

    BleedingEdge Guest

    I had it 10-2 Pacquiao.
     
  6. TJay

    TJay Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    I had the same score.
     
  7. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,924
    Likes Received:
    7
    Anybody who has Bradley winning is ******ed.
     
  8. 7 decisive rounds vs 1. I dont see how one could argue that.
     
  9. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    48,204
    Likes Received:
    9
    hater, blind, *****, jmm fan
     
  10. marianass

    marianass Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Messages:
    544
    Likes Received:
    0
    and the newwww....
     
  11. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,875
    Likes Received:
    13
    Timothy "Desert Storm" Bradley

    [yt]OHPBqGXPq8Q[/yt]
     
  12. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    4,926
    Likes Received:
    0
    :deal :deal :deal
     
  13. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    13,705
    Likes Received:
    292
    Kudos to Max for going as far as he can, within his legal and contractual restraints, with calling the judges flat-out corrupt.

    And I agree exactly with his "rounds won" tally, but not with his "decisive" opinion.

    Max is suffering from the dreaded "compubox" syndrome with some of those "decisive for Pac" rounds, since half of Pac's shots didn't land. We could see this clearly, without the need for slo-mo, so why couldn't he?

    -----------

    BTW, Max, if you happen to be reading this thread (and I bet he does) next fight, WEAR A T-SHIRT !
     
  14. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,217
    Likes Received:
    3
    Because Max Kellerman is really going to say HBO's Cashcow lost.

    And of course he can call the Judges out - It went against the result that HBO (His Bosses) wanted.

    And obviously TV Execs push these guys into saying what their respective networks want us to think.

    It's no different to 'Reality TV' being nothing like Reality.
     
  15. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,060
    Likes Received:
    0
    Another article:

    This content is protected