Boxing.com's heavyweight poll - the result

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, May 16, 2012.


  1. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    :yep


    I'm arrogant and not very clever about it.
     
  2. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Pretty good list and amazing how close Rocky and Holmes are. Those videos are very nice as well, I like the Marciano one by Ura-Nage - he used to post here. I believe he also had an awesome Frazier highlight.

    Sidenote: Monte Cox was pissed that I made a video highlighting some of Marciano's defensive moves. So pissed off that he had to make his own video about Joe Louis, which is linked there.
     
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Looks quite a bit like ESB list. I think there's might be better. Interestingly enough, we have the same ten fighters. We have Johnson higher, they have Foreman higher.

    How does Fitzie break the top 20 but not Langford or Willis though... I guess it's because he made more top ten lists than Langford or Willis. I won't scream about race, but there's no way guys like Corbett and Fitzie are more deserving of such mentions...
     
  4. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    I completely agree with this opinion. :deal

    At least you agree Dempsey belongs lower. :good

    However, please tell me how you came to the conclusion Dempsey "beat a lot of really good fighters"? :think

    I think they must put a lot of stock in his perceived H2H ability.

    Riddick & Mike underachieved more imo.

    Not on my list.
    This content is protected
     
  5. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    No Harry Wills is pretty ridiculous.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    Miske, Brennan, Sharkey, Gibbons, Fulton then Firpo, Carpantier, Levinksy...what would you call them?
     
  7. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    nice to see holmes get some love at #3 on the list. sam langford only got one vote for the top 20 heavys. it's really a shame. he's #1 on my all-time lb for lb list. fitzsimmons at 20 is kind of a joke. much respect to all he accomplished but he's hardly a top 20 all-time heavy and he sure as hell isn't better than sam langford at heavy or any weight.
     
  8. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,498
    5,744
    Aug 19, 2010
    They´ll do more polls at the the other weight classes McGrain ?
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,309
    Feb 15, 2006
    I agree that Langford should be in the top 20, but that dosn't mean that Fitzsimmons shouldn't.

    Fitz put prety much every heavyweight player of his era to the sword, with the exception of Jeffries.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007

    Supposedly. We'll see how enthusiasm is once they get 9 votes in the Cruiserweights though...


    You know you're not getting everyone from that era in one twenty. Wills is the big miss i think.
     
  11. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    good point but i like to consider H2H matchups as well on my all-time lists. great fighter in his era, no question but i don't think he matches up well vs a lot of the other fighters on the list.
     
  12. EverLast

    EverLast Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,175
    6
    Oct 20, 2009
    Ali
    Louis
    Johnson
    Foreman
    Frazier
    Holmes
    Tyson
    Dempsey
    Marciano
    Liston
     
  13. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Miske was suffering Bright's Disease causing bleeding inflamed kidneys & died from the disease just 4 years after Dempsey disposed of his corpse, he absolutely wouldn't be sanctioned in modern times.

    Firpo & Fulton were very crude & unskilled giant oafs, half decent, but not "really good"... if these two guys were fighting today, they'd be ridiculed like Wach & Ustinov as lumbering lummoxes.

    Sharkey was a very good fighter, but that fight pisses me off to this day. Sharkey was clearly dominating Dempsey before those nasty lowblows. Without that cheating he would've lost. Although, big credit to Dempsey, this is his greatest win by a tremendous margin.

    Brennan, good win for his day, wouldn't be a Heavyweight now, but decent name. Actually he gave Dempsey sheer hell from what I remember, so if he can give such a "great" fighter a great war, then I guess i'll give you him as a very good win.

    Gibbons was extremely small, like a Middleweight today, however credit for going the distance & making it thoroughly competitive. The last Great Heavyweight this guy could've troubled would be Liston (due to his problems with very small men), whereas those afterwards would toy with his. Ok McGrain, provided he's facing sub-190lb "Heavyweight" Champs, i'll say Gibbons is very good.

    Carpentier... exactly the same case a Gibbons, see above.

    Levinsky... great Lightheavy totally lacking in any Durability of Chin whatsoever against Heavyweight punches, good win.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,126
    48,360
    Mar 21, 2007
    In 1918? I'm not sure he was actually. At the very least I'd like to see that proven. Miske fell ill at the end of this year according to Bill Paxton, though Clay should have the final word on this.

    You may have forgotten that Dempsey beat Miske twice.

    But this is hyperbole for even the 1920 version, that "corpse" disposed of guys like Brennan, Fulton and Gibbons after Dempsey beat him. That's a bit like a corpse beating Afolabi, Cunningham and Jones over the next 12 months which, of course, would make him #1 at cruiserweight.

    This is absolutely ludicrous. First of all, what footage have you seen that leads you to believe that worlds heavyweight #1 contender Fulton was "very crude"? This is the guy that out-jabbed an ageing Sam Langford, but you've seen footage that contradicts the natural conclusion I take it?

    Secondly, writing off the crude, and, in my opinion, underqualified Firpo "half decent" when he beat Willard, Brennan and Weinhart. He was indeed crude, but given that there were likely only six or seven boxers on the entire planet that could have beaten him at the time he matched Dempsey, don't you think you're getting a little over-excited?


    Brennan had one good round, the second or third I think, then they split a few. It's interesting though, you've basically taken the attitude of the writers of the day who hammered him a bit expecting him to do much better than he did.

    So? When he met Dempsey he was rated one of the best heavyweights in the world. Great scalp for the 188lb Dempsey, who outweighed Gibbons by considerably less than Lewis did Holyfield (though Holyfield is listed as being amongst Lewis's best wins).

    European heavyweight champion.

    Pound for pounder moving up against a guy who outweighed him by ten pounds.
     
  15. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,627
    2,512
    Nov 6, 2011
    I don't see how Langford gets in the top 20. In fact I could name 20 Heavys right now that are probably more deserving

    1. Ali
    2. Lewis
    3. Johnson
    4. Holmes
    5. Foreman
    6. Lewis
    7. Marciano
    8. Frazier
    9. Holyfield
    10. Tyson
    11. Liston
    12. Bowe
    13. Tunney
    14. Dempsey
    15. Jeffries
    16. Norton
    17. Wlad
    18. Vitali
    19. Charles
    20. Schmelling

    Could probably squeeze out a few more if I could really be bothered