Pretty good list and amazing how close Rocky and Holmes are. Those videos are very nice as well, I like the Marciano one by Ura-Nage - he used to post here. I believe he also had an awesome Frazier highlight. Sidenote: Monte Cox was pissed that I made a video highlighting some of Marciano's defensive moves. So pissed off that he had to make his own video about Joe Louis, which is linked there.
Looks quite a bit like ESB list. I think there's might be better. Interestingly enough, we have the same ten fighters. We have Johnson higher, they have Foreman higher. How does Fitzie break the top 20 but not Langford or Willis though... I guess it's because he made more top ten lists than Langford or Willis. I won't scream about race, but there's no way guys like Corbett and Fitzie are more deserving of such mentions...
I completely agree with this opinion. :deal At least you agree Dempsey belongs lower. :good However, please tell me how you came to the conclusion Dempsey "beat a lot of really good fighters"? :think I think they must put a lot of stock in his perceived H2H ability. Riddick & Mike underachieved more imo. Not on my list. This content is protected
Miske, Brennan, Sharkey, Gibbons, Fulton then Firpo, Carpantier, Levinksy...what would you call them?
nice to see holmes get some love at #3 on the list. sam langford only got one vote for the top 20 heavys. it's really a shame. he's #1 on my all-time lb for lb list. fitzsimmons at 20 is kind of a joke. much respect to all he accomplished but he's hardly a top 20 all-time heavy and he sure as hell isn't better than sam langford at heavy or any weight.
I agree that Langford should be in the top 20, but that dosn't mean that Fitzsimmons shouldn't. Fitz put prety much every heavyweight player of his era to the sword, with the exception of Jeffries.
Supposedly. We'll see how enthusiasm is once they get 9 votes in the Cruiserweights though... You know you're not getting everyone from that era in one twenty. Wills is the big miss i think.
good point but i like to consider H2H matchups as well on my all-time lists. great fighter in his era, no question but i don't think he matches up well vs a lot of the other fighters on the list.
Miske was suffering Bright's Disease causing bleeding inflamed kidneys & died from the disease just 4 years after Dempsey disposed of his corpse, he absolutely wouldn't be sanctioned in modern times. Firpo & Fulton were very crude & unskilled giant oafs, half decent, but not "really good"... if these two guys were fighting today, they'd be ridiculed like Wach & Ustinov as lumbering lummoxes. Sharkey was a very good fighter, but that fight pisses me off to this day. Sharkey was clearly dominating Dempsey before those nasty lowblows. Without that cheating he would've lost. Although, big credit to Dempsey, this is his greatest win by a tremendous margin. Brennan, good win for his day, wouldn't be a Heavyweight now, but decent name. Actually he gave Dempsey sheer hell from what I remember, so if he can give such a "great" fighter a great war, then I guess i'll give you him as a very good win. Gibbons was extremely small, like a Middleweight today, however credit for going the distance & making it thoroughly competitive. The last Great Heavyweight this guy could've troubled would be Liston (due to his problems with very small men), whereas those afterwards would toy with his. Ok McGrain, provided he's facing sub-190lb "Heavyweight" Champs, i'll say Gibbons is very good. Carpentier... exactly the same case a Gibbons, see above. Levinsky... great Lightheavy totally lacking in any Durability of Chin whatsoever against Heavyweight punches, good win.
In 1918? I'm not sure he was actually. At the very least I'd like to see that proven. Miske fell ill at the end of this year according to Bill Paxton, though Clay should have the final word on this. You may have forgotten that Dempsey beat Miske twice. But this is hyperbole for even the 1920 version, that "corpse" disposed of guys like Brennan, Fulton and Gibbons after Dempsey beat him. That's a bit like a corpse beating Afolabi, Cunningham and Jones over the next 12 months which, of course, would make him #1 at cruiserweight. This is absolutely ludicrous. First of all, what footage have you seen that leads you to believe that worlds heavyweight #1 contender Fulton was "very crude"? This is the guy that out-jabbed an ageing Sam Langford, but you've seen footage that contradicts the natural conclusion I take it? Secondly, writing off the crude, and, in my opinion, underqualified Firpo "half decent" when he beat Willard, Brennan and Weinhart. He was indeed crude, but given that there were likely only six or seven boxers on the entire planet that could have beaten him at the time he matched Dempsey, don't you think you're getting a little over-excited? Brennan had one good round, the second or third I think, then they split a few. It's interesting though, you've basically taken the attitude of the writers of the day who hammered him a bit expecting him to do much better than he did. So? When he met Dempsey he was rated one of the best heavyweights in the world. Great scalp for the 188lb Dempsey, who outweighed Gibbons by considerably less than Lewis did Holyfield (though Holyfield is listed as being amongst Lewis's best wins). European heavyweight champion. Pound for pounder moving up against a guy who outweighed him by ten pounds.
I don't see how Langford gets in the top 20. In fact I could name 20 Heavys right now that are probably more deserving 1. Ali 2. Lewis 3. Johnson 4. Holmes 5. Foreman 6. Lewis 7. Marciano 8. Frazier 9. Holyfield 10. Tyson 11. Liston 12. Bowe 13. Tunney 14. Dempsey 15. Jeffries 16. Norton 17. Wlad 18. Vitali 19. Charles 20. Schmelling Could probably squeeze out a few more if I could really be bothered