Boxing: A Tale of HBO Nuthuggery (A MUST WATCH)

Watched the video last night, and while I do think it's effective in showcasing the HBO crew's clear bias, it's also pretty darn selective and biased in it's own right. It's got a hint of Michael Moore about it.

Still, if it makes Lampley and that fool Lederman squirm a bit, then I'm happy.

 

Good point!:good. But logically speaking........those who make up your very small group of individuals who have been at the forefront of study and progression in the fields "science & eveloution", throughout history, come along once....maybe twice in a generation.

Comparing science & evolution to Timmy or Pac is taking things to a whole other level. I admit.......my comparison to the "insane" was a bit dramatic as well, that was part of my intentions.....but there have been far more clinically insane folks in this world than "Einstein's"....or "Newton's". I'm just saying..

 

Another badass post from you, ****ing awesome!

 

Interesting, i'll have a look after.

 

So we are accusing the same majority who scored the last fight for Marquez of suddenly becoming deluded *******s? Yeah...right. I guess these evolutions just sprang up for the Bradley fight...what the **** are you talking about? So during the course of this fight, a superior minority evolved that could view the fight without bias..., this is just getting sad.

Hey, remember when people were justifying the Holyfield/Lewis draw...:roll:

 

Its a mute point anyway. This same supposively biased majority living a lie of delusion..blah blah blah had Marquez beating Pacman in a much closely contested fight.

Apparenlty this 97% or whatever huge majority of supposively blind sheep didn't come into existence into the Bradley fight...so...yeah, totally preposterous claim. Maybe Bradley just wasn't convincing. Just a thought.

 

Here's a thought, how do you know for certain the punches highlighted in the video were actually counted by compubox? Chances are, they probably weren't.

 

:deal

 

:nono


Doctored footage.

Bradley got beaten up for 12 rounds, ate 100 left hands a round, didn't land a single jab or body shot, and should have lost 120-108. (and that's if you're extremely generous and don't give Pac any of the five or six 10-8 rounds he probably deserved for having Bradley on ***** St. half the time)

 

Lampley nuthugger :fire

 

Unless of course if we're talking about the opinions of journalists, trainers, boxers et al....we must assume if the overwhelming majority of those kinds of people favor Pacquiao wide than their truth must supercede those of the likes of you.





.....lemme guess, they're clueless sheep as well.

 

Brian Kenny former boxer and former ESPN analyst had Bradley winning 8-4. I had that fight a draw, after watching the third round, I had the fight 115-113 for Bradley.

 

Why has everybody got to bring up the Marquez-fight and why does everybody assume you have to be a die hard-Pacquiao-hater to score the fight for Bradley?

 

Everytime I see the thread title I think: HBO Legendary Nights: A Tale Of Nuthuggery lol