LOL, they put a ? mark on Bradley's record

Castillo got robbed as well... He clearly beat Void! The decision was a joke..

 

Bradley dominated. No amount of corrupt coverups and HBO cheerleading can hide the dominant display of boxing Bradley displayed. And with two injured feet nonetheless.

All roads lead through Bradley, there is no blueprint.

 

It wasn't close. Maybe it was close in terms of the fighters popularity and fanbase but the fight wasn't close. Pacquiao did absolutely nothing but come straight forward and get countered all night and he got rewarded for aggression but when Bradley is the aggressor and wins then suddenly it's different?

It was the same exact situation. Only in my opinion Bradley didn't get hit as much.

 

So what if official? 99% of fans and boxing writers said PAC won. That's more important.

 

If you really think Bradley won then I suggest you stop watching Boxing... That **** was easy to score!

 

So why is Pacquiao so special? Because he's a politician? Because he has support of foreign Prime minsters?

I don't care who you think won. I used to be a Pacquiao fan too, but this has gone too far. Pacquiao is trying to win the fight outside the ring instead of winning it like a warrior inside the ring. This sort of bias makes Pacquiao look bad and ruins the sport.

Don't punish Bradley for receiving what you think is a gift decision. Pacquiao has received at least 2 gift decisions against Marquez. Floyd has received gift decisions too. The only reason the reaction wasn't like this is because they received gift decisions against lesser name fighters.

Lara couldn't do anything to contest the Williams decision because he didn't speak english. That fight was the clearest robbery of the century, more clear than any other I've seen and they didn't reverse that decision.

But when Khan claims he was robbed vs Peterson suddenly the special treatment? I'm noticing that Freddy Roach's camp is receiving special treatment and I don't like it. I'll be a fan of Pacquiao again if he takes a rematch against Bradley or Marquez and wins fair and square but right now his camp is acting like a bunch of spoiled suckers.

 

so what there is 4 ?'s on 4 other fights on his record its not being over turned. like pac said after jmm was robbed you have to respect the judges no matter how bad the decision is

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

so much for Bradley domination. What fight did you see btw?

 

At this point it doesn't matter who won. We are turning boxing into a popularity contest and if that is the case the challenger can never win against the champion without knocking the champion out.

You could say Bradley won that fight if you favor Bradley's style of fighting or you could say Pacquiao won that fight if you favor Pacquiao's style of fighting and the same could be said about the Marquez fight. Bradley wasn't imposing his will but neither was Pacquiao, and in the Marquez fight it was the same thing.

In my opinion the last two fights Pacquiao has been in have been controversial because of Pacquiao. He's blaming leg craps, he's blaming judges, he's blaming everyone but himself. If he would have just knocked Marquez and Bradley out like he was supposed to we wouldn't be having this controversy.

He needs to finish the job in the ring and stop with this cowardly "We're gonna call the FBI, we're gonna change the decision, Bradley should give us our belt back", that's not what boxing is about. If someone took your belt there is a traditional way of getting it back and we all know what that way is and it doesn't involve the feds, judges, or investigations.

 

Exactly. This stuff is going to ruin the sport of boxing. It's breaking tradition.

When Roy Jones Jr was DQ'd against Montell Griffin he didn't beg them to reverse his loss. He didn't go to President Clinton and demand his loss be reversed. When he was robbed out of a gold medal he didn't protest it to Congress. He went and he KO'd Montell Griffin in the first round, blasted him the **** out.

Pacquiao has to do that to both Marquez and Bradley or his legacy is going to be stained by this. This isn't going to hurt Marquez or Bradley but it will hurt Pacquiao because Pacquiao is now acting like a part time boxer and full time politician. Even in 24/7 he was on Jesus.

 

hes still got a win though on boxrec. LOL

 

if pac was a real man he would rematch tim and if he is so good ko him but he won't i wonder why? anyone wanna answer me that question

 

whats great about this is that it makes it easy to separate the trolls from legit posters. this place is classic :good

ive got like 53 digheads on ignore and the list keeps growing and growing

 

No it's not more important. Boxing is a traditional sport, it's not professional wrestling where it's all about the fans. Yes Arum wants to say Pacquiao won because Pacquiao brings in the money. Writers will say Pacquiao won because Pacquiao is better for the sport. But there is a reason why we should trust the judges, the popular fighter isn't always the fighter who won inside the ring.

At this point Pacquiao has beat Marquez and Bradley outside the ring but he hasn't beaten them inside the ring. The only way to beat them inside the ring is to knock Marquez or Bradley out which would end all debate.

Why didn't he knock them out in the first place? Any boxer knows if you let a fight go to the judges there is a chance it could not go your way which is why fighters try to knock each other out. This is all Pacquiao's fault for not going for the KO.

 

i agree boxmaster, people need to get real last time i checked titles are won in the ring i was a fan of pacs but after theses last few fights im losing respect for him