Rewatched the pac vs bradley fight

atsch

Goes to show your agenda.. You're not a boxing fan, just a JMM fan.. Still bitter about JMM losing twice to Pacqioa while escaping the first fight by a draw which later on, one judge admitted that he should've scored 10-6 on the first round instead of 10-7.. And you are an idiot for scoring Pacquioa-Bradley fight that close.. You just won't miss a chance to hate Pac.. :deal You are one of the JMM fans I don't really respect..

Just to give you an idea of how "CLOSE" it was according to you.. atsch

This content is protected

And the bets get refunded..

http://tracking.si.com/2012/06/10/pacquiao-vs-bradley-bets-refunded-manny-timothy/

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-site-refunds-money-after-outrageous-decision

Oh My God! That was a "CLOSE" fight! atsch atsch

 

Well stop watchin boxin then, and get off the website because you don't know **** about boxing. Just keep your ass in the lounge or in the MMA forum and go back to watchin two dudes ****in.

You don't know **** about boxing.

 

Our principal argument: Pacquiao outclassed Bradley even if Ross and Ford didn’t see it; he simply doesn’t deserve to be punished whatsoever for something over which he had no control. To take the opposite approach would be giving tacit approval to a shameful performance by the judges.
“I don't think Pacquiao should be punished because of two dumb-ass judges. He dominated an undefeated pound-for-pound-rated fighter in his prime,” said Doug Fischer, Editor of RingTV.com.
Thus, here’s what we did:

• Mayweather and Pacquiao remain tied for No. 2 pound-for-pound. Rememember, when we decided to have them share the No. 2 position, we said one must do something special to separate from the other. Neither did in their most recent fights.
• Pacquiao and Mayweather remain Nos. 1 and 2 in the welterweight ratings.
• Bradley enters the welterweight ratings at No. 8 based on a his credible performance against one of the two highest-rated fighters and also remains No. 1 at junior welterweight until we’re clear on his future at that weight. We considered rating him higher at 147 but the fact is he should’ve lost a one-sided decision.

:deal :deal

 

The fight was really "CLOSE" they have the need for a review.. And it was "CLOSE".. :admin :admin

Divac is a f*cking genius by scoring it 115-114..

atsch atsch

 

This fight was much closer than what the HBO crew and fake punchstats were stating throughout the whole night. I had Manny winning 115-113 but could have also had it a draw. Manny did land the cleaner, harder, more effective punches. But I felt he was being very inactive in the first two minutes on almost every round. Bradley stayed busy the whole 3 minutes even when Manny was in the attack. He also made Manny miss a lot of punches and counter well at times. Once again this fight was much closer and Manny should have been busier instead of trying to steal rounds by finishing strong towards the end of each round.

 

which rounds did you give bradley cause scoring 5 rounds for bradley is very generous let alone giving him 6 or 7. bradley won 1 clear round and that's it. would you give those rounds to bradley where he was punching pac's gloves?

 

If you watch the fight again CLOSELY and turn down the volume, you'll have Bradley winning via KO.

 

in the age of "workrate" pacquiao won....if you score by effective aggression, defense, and ring generalship, bradley inched it out

 

what fight were you watching? pac was better in all the categories except workrate. bradley was more active but not effective. his punches mostly landed on pac's gloves.

 

:good

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2aTd-coddI[/ame]

 

rewatched it and PAC was KOed. BRATLEY, new Wheelchair weight champion of the world! case closed...:hat

 

The fact is that so did Pac's on Bradley. In fact, Pacquiao did alot more missing. Shots just not even touching not even arms or elbows. Shots just plain out catching nothing but air.

There are several well made videos posted about this forum that exposes HBO's and Jim Lampley's agenda.
"The left, Pacquiao again lands with the left. There it goes again Emmanuel, another left by Pacquiao!"

Harold Lederman- "I tell you Jim, Pacquiao just cant miss Bradley with the left. Bradley just is'nt moving his waist. He just stands there stationary and Pacquiao cant miss him."
......and yet the replays and video evidence of exchanges both Lampley and Lederman speak of clearly show Pacquiao missing those lefts Lampley said he was landing, plus the evidence showed that Bradley's waist and swivel movements to evade shots were much more active than Pacquiao's!


Jesus, that video evidence just pinpoints HBO's agenda and analytical inaccuracies its outright hillariously laughable! :rofl

 

Hats off to ya, takes a real person to step up and admit they drank the kool aid.:good Close fight either guy could have won it I had it 7-5 Tim Bradley

 

I gave rounds 1, 2 and 9-12 to Bradley, so i had it a draw. I honestly think the judges tried to score it the way they saw it with no bias.

 

I'm a Floyd fan and had Pacquiao winning 11-1. Only saw and scored it once though so I will rewatch it, I feel its worth it. I enjoyed the fight just felt it was a robbery. May have a closer card next time around.