The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Do I? :huh

    And according to you tyson case is debatable considering you already believe he did not do it.
     
  2. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    it isnt debatable because he never appealed and was found guilty, I would expect someone of your caliber to have followed the case as it un folded and I also expected you were intelligent enough to make up your own mind regarding the case at hand.

    Apparently you started to follow this sport when May fought Gatti?
     
  3. Emeritus

    Emeritus Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,109
    1
    Jan 22, 2010
    Out of all the things I have typed aimed at you THIS is what you freaking respond to?

    I didn't say I had a problem with it, I don't even know the facts surrounding what she did....

    Stop being so emotional....
     
  4. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    No.. The Mayweather/USADA thing has had nothing said on it at all since what you initially put out, but everything else was confirmed immediately before or after you said it.. It makes me question if you actually have anything on Mayweather/USADA, or if you simply get inside information (Conte/VADA) on when a test has been confirmed positive immediately before it's to be made public.
     
  5. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    You don't need to pay child support when your already supporting your kids. Got full custody of them and you let her live for free, in your house.

    She lost her case in NV. So no she did not deserve child support. She then moved to CA because it's easier there. This ***** moved to CA for the SOLE purpose of reapplying for child support. That's a shady *****.

    Child support isn't paid when custody is full to Floyd or majority, which it is.
     
  6. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    Sounds like something a ***** would say:lol:

    How in the **** can you justify **** vs other forms of abuse? Man you an idiot? I would give you a little bit of credit if you were consistent.

    Personally, I have never ever said one word in support of PBF in regards to the abuse he was found guilty for . . . and never will. There is never a reason to put your hands on a woman, abuse a child, hurt the elderly or by far the worse offense ****
     
  7. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    if she has child support in california that means she is the custodial parent learn a thing or two about life kid.
    California is not going to grant her support if she doesnt have full custody and she was granted full custody after the domestic violence charge there was also a restraining order issued against Floyd.

    if you really think Floyd has full custody and that his ex is collecting child support that just proves you really dont know what your talking about in this matter

    No state is going to grant child support to a woman who is not the custodial parent especially when Floyd has a legal team that would exploit that...

    What do I mean? Ms Harris would be committing fraud and California would be breaking the law
     
  8. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Nobody is justifying **** I do not believe he raped her, as does the majority. to this day Tyson still maintains his innocence. However to be honest I never really supported Mike anyways that was just some bull**** that Blade threw out there...
    What about Tyson... Well he served his time didnt get special treatment hasnt re offended lets hope Floyd can do the same.
    Either way my question remains why is it so important to you guys that everybody love Floyd :think
     
  9. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Your not getting it.

    She applied for child support in NV...she was denied.

    Her sole purpose of moving to CA was because it's easier to get child support there. Her sole purpose of moving to CA was so she could apply here and get child support here.

    What you just said had almost nothing to do with anything. You interpreted what I said wrong.
     
  10. Emeritus

    Emeritus Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,109
    1
    Jan 22, 2010
    She doesn't have full custody....they have joint custody.
     
  11. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    She doesn't have full custody either.
     
  12. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    You said Floyd has custody, if that was true she would not have been awarded support in California. that alone slams the door, in fact go source that she was denied support in Nevada I would like to see if what your even saying is the truth.
     
  13. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Bazooka speaks on **** before he does his research.
     
  14. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    tyson hasnt reoffended lol
     
  15. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    I don't remember who said it but that's what I heard. I heard she was denied child support in NV so she moved to CA to file there, because it's easier to get child support in CA.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.