Why does Pacquiao duck boxers who are technicians like....

Why does Pacquiao duck boxers who are technicians like. Humberto soto, Zahir Raheem, prime Nate Campbell, Marquez (for years he ducked the trilogy) and Floyd Mayweather?


If you're slick or a technical fighter who can think in the ring. Pac will duck you and move up to fight a stiff boxer with no movement :nono


"I want to put on a show for the fans" Pac

Really means. "I want to fight a guy who can't think in the ring and will allow me to hit"

When you see a few loses on a atg's resume by a so called no name contender it's because he fought boxers with varies styles, and eventually one of those styles throw you off. Team Pac know what style throws him off. So it's easy to say he would of killed Nate Campbell or Soto got his ass wooped this weekend he would of killed him. But that not the case. They know what they're doing

 

20 page thread coming.

 

Well it is the truth

 

Basically,if he didn't fight them, he MUST have ducked them right? :roll:

You haven't even provided anything substantial around the circumstances.

"Ducked a trilogy"....jesus christs you sound like an idiot...atsch

 

:roll: Dountful. The OP doesn't even make any valid points.

 

styles make fights. nobody wants to see pac fight someone who is gonna run like mosley did. its an ugly and boring fight. tr knows what they r doing and they make millions making fights that people want to see like pac vs cotto

 

Ducked Marquezatsch. Ducked Floyd .

Floyd: PAC could cripple me and make me walk all bent over. I know y'all ain't going to pay for my bills so stop forcing me to fight him. I'm a coward .

 

with regards to jmm, pac with his interviews before the trilogy, felt that he already beat jmm 2 times and didn't see the need to fight him again.

...you shouldn't even bring floyd's name up, homo was just ****in' around. the rest don't deserve a response.

 

All I know is that he's fought more technicians than Floyd.

 

He fought Marquez 3 times. Barrera and Morales were both sound technicians. While Cotto's preparation was terrible for that fight, he has a very good boxing skillset. Solis had a decent set of out-fighting skills. Clottey is a defensive boxer who throws straight punches. Hatton wasn't slick but he was a sound infighter. Bradley is one of the most well-rounded stylistic boxers in the sport today.

If you want him to fight Pernell Whitaker, he's not around today. If you want him to fight Floyd, we'll have to wait until he gets out of jail. Until then, broaden your definition of "technical" and make due without the slickness at 147.

 

This content is protected

 

Humberto soto, Zahir Raheem, Nate Campbell technicians?

You talk as if these guys are intelligent fighters. They're not. Nate in his prime was so technical that he gave someone a free shot and his career got turned upside down.

Soto just got his ass kicked by a puncher. Raheem lost to wildman Freitas in his prime. None of these guys were ever in a position to get a shot, and none of them were ever intelligent or good enough to beat pac.

 

Soto a technician ? Maybe in his side job. He dont move his head. Pac would khtfo.

 

i lost you when you said they are technicians... probably what the TS means is that these boxers are cable guy technicians or repair guy technicians, or typewriter technicians or something like that.

 

So many idiots these days.