Goldenboy Says No Fight After Trout Requests VADA Testing For Canelo Fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Fanatic, Jun 25, 2012.


  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    Classic case of looking for something that isn't there.
     
  2. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,218
    27,919
    Feb 10, 2011
    It doesn't matter if they're GBP fighters or not. They were part of the promotion and because they tested positive, the fight had to be cancelled.

    Maybe Canelo is clean, but what if Trout testing positive a month before the fight? There goes the whole promotion. The point is that if either fighter gets caught, regardless of whether or not they're part of GBP, they will lose millions.
     
  3. P4P_Hero

    P4P_Hero Guest

    **** this ****, who the **** is Canelo fighting now then?:twisted:
     
  4. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    And once again I will ask you, do you seriously believe that a credible drug testing organisation like USADA will hide positive test results just so golden boy promotions can do their event?:lol:
     
  5. EONS

    EONS Active Member Full Member

    756
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    I am having a good time reading how people here still believe that just because a fighter is testing negative it means that he is clean. If a fighter is using steroids when he is not fighting but comes off them before a fight then he should still be labeled a cheater. I am not accusing any of your favorite fighters, because some of you love them more than your own family members it seems. I will however say that we do not know which fighters are clean until we do year round random drug testing on all of them, anyone who fails to see that is just trolling.
     
  6. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Well that isn't gonna happen anytime soon, so one step at a time mate.:thumbsup
     
  7. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    47,186
    14,390
    Mar 5, 2006
    NSAC is good enough for me..
     
  8. EONS

    EONS Active Member Full Member

    756
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    By the time that happens all of the people posting on this board will most likely be dead including myself.:D
     
  9. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,218
    27,919
    Feb 10, 2011
    If it's in the contract, then it will be enforced. This is not the Olympics or International sporting events where the USADA voluntarily release results.

    This is boxing, controlled by promoters where testing is NOT mandatory. Provisions can be set in place so that in the case of a positive or false-positive, an entire event isn't cancelled. Promoters aren't stupid. They want control and they'd negotiate for control. They have investments and they'd do anything to protect those investments.

    What you fail to understand about a boxing promoter working with a drug testing company is that it's not about exposing cheats, it's about BUSINESS. promoters pay money for testing, and the USADA in this case is nothing more than a vendor. And vendors have contracts with their clients.

    Once you start working in the real world, you'll start to understand.
     
  10. EONS

    EONS Active Member Full Member

    756
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    Very true, What's good for the goose is good for the gander.:lol:
     
  11. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    You really aren't good at this are you. USADA is a non profit organisation :patsch:patsch
     
  12. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    Dam dude you are hating hard in this thread. The fact GBP is even using extra testing when other promotional companies like tr refuse to use it should look positive on GBP. I stead, you criticize them when they wont use it for one fight when other companies never use it?

    So basically you are mad because you think they lied about cleaning up the sport. Big deal, Arum has done worse. At least they are trying when others continue to ignore th problem.
     
  13. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,218
    27,919
    Feb 10, 2011
    Oh really? Then why did Golden Boy paid the USADA about 100k for testing per fight? $100,000...you read that right. That's PROFIT. Again, the USADA is the vendor in this case and golden boy is the client.

    You are only partially right to say that the USADA is a non-profit organization. They are funded by government money. However, that funding is only for U.S. Olympic, Paralympic, Pan-American and ParaPan American events, but NOT FOR PROFESSIONAL BOXING. Testing for boxing events is not covered by government funding. Instead, the cost of the testing must be paid by the promoter. In this case, Golden Boy is paying the cost and any business deal where money is involved, a contract is mandatory.

    Do you really think Golden Boy is pay $100K to risk losing millions? No promoter is that stupid.
     
  14. EONS

    EONS Active Member Full Member

    756
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    Does anyone here know that most non-profit organizations hardly give any money to the needy people they claim to help. Most of them have such large operating budgets that most of their money goes to paying hefty salaries to their executives and towards maintaining their operations. Don't take my words for it as this is according to extensive research done by scholars.
     
  15. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    I just find it very entertaining the majority of the money given to USADA is from the government yet they would risk all their credibility so they can fake drug tests results just so golden boy could save money.