TYSON FURY vs Sherman Tank Williams

Charr is better than Fury? Baeed on what? Struggling badly with Nacsimento and shot Danny Williams? Come off it.

Before you bring up the Firtha and Pajkic fights Fury had, it is obvious that Fury wasn't 100% for those fights.

 

Based on it's cool to hate fury of course or did you expect some real breakdown

 

In every thread about Fury, someone always has a go at him.

 

He'd give him a decent fight. We can answer this better on Thurs night when Williams fights Chauncy Welliver. Its been a few years since Sherman has had a decent fight (in terms of rounds).

 

Charr is not in Fury's leauge.

Charr could not even pass the Zack Page test, needing a gift to get by, whereas Fury won every round.

There is no one on Charr's record that is of Chisora level. In fact, I think Chisora would win that one.

I will not say Charr is garbage, but he certainly has a manufactured record.

 

The Tank was well on his way to beating Holyfield, but that's not such an achievement these days.

 

atschatschatschatschatsch

 

Fury looks in shape compared to Charr. One body shot from Vitali will send him down.

 

And Manuel Charr HAS fought someone of note?

 

He better watch out and protect those whiskers, this is the guy who almost stopped Holyfield. :yep

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRMBxnxWiNQ&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

I watched the Charr vs Nascsimento fight on Eurosport..........Charr did start slowly........but Charr was always in control of the fight and didn't "struggle badly" as you put it.

As for Fury......... a fight with Charr would be 50/50.
Fury has the advantage of size and weight of punches.........but Charr is better at protecting his chin but neither fighter is a world beater.

 

Naaaaaaaahhhhhh.

Charr is awful. Fury is a league above.