Chris Eubank vs Mike McCallum At MW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Jun 29, 2012.


  1. sas6789

    sas6789 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,662
    107
    Sep 15, 2011
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,612
    2,502
    Nov 6, 2011
    I'd expect many too pick McCallum by decision as he clearly was the superior boxer and I'll follow suit. I don't count Eubank out completely but I find it very hard seeing him beating a Prime Mike. He keeps it competitive but the clear winner is obvious.

    McCallum UD 116-112
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,183
    8,695
    Jul 17, 2009

    The Bodysnatcher by decision. Too busy and skillful for Eubank.
     
  4. Box-Fan

    Box-Fan Active Member Full Member

    771
    27
    May 31, 2012
    McCallum pretty clear ud
     
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,107
    15,591
    Dec 20, 2006
    Wow...2 of my all time (non Philly) favs. This fight would be awesome...I don't have any idea who I would pick or cheer for?
     
  6. jdempsey85

    jdempsey85 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,508
    106
    Apr 23, 2011
    another controversial eubank victory by SD
     
  7. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Eubank was simply too big, too strong, too young, too fast and too mobile for Mike. A natural junior-middle against a big light-heavy, 10 years apart. McCallum always struggled with movers (Curry, Kalambay, Graham), too, and Eubank had about the best lateral foot movement in the business.

    Eubank should get him out if he put his punches together on an in-coming Mike.
     
  8. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Mike ate Toney's counter rights all night long, sure, but Julian Jackson had him on ***** street, hanging in there for dear life in the opening round - and Collins and Watson forced him back a lot
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,145
    13,104
    Jan 4, 2008
    Like Watson was?;)

    He struggled because they were all very good fighters (and Curry wasn't really a mover). Still, he's 3-1 against themand at least two of them were superior boxers to Eubank.

    And yes, Mike was at his best at JMW, but had the rangy body to put on weight. He won a title at LHW against the very strong and tough Harding, and had his last fight at CW.

    He took Jackson's best before stopping him. Jones didn't come close to stopping a shot McCallum at LMW. Eubank ain't stopping him.

    Mike is busy and accurate enough to win a decision.
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    McCallum had a big fat gut at LHW. Eubank had a six-pack at CW.
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,145
    13,104
    Jan 4, 2008
    Toney had a big fat gut at HW, but beat the **** out of a ripped Holyfield. Six-packs don't win fights.;)

    Anyhow, at MW, McCallum didn't have any excess weight and was never bullied around in the ring, even though he clearly wasn't as strong as for example Watson. Mike's combination of strength, craft and skill meant that the other guys' strength and power never was such an issue. He struggled more with speed.
     
  12. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    McCallum wasn't pushed around d ring or bullied by Watson . I remember d opposite : McCallum pushing Watson back and it made me wonder .
    However , six packs do tell something , they suggest that d man who has them is stronger than another man @ same weight who has a belly .
    Watson was 9 years younger than McCallum . Eubanks was 10 years younger and somewhere it has 2 matter . Most of times a much smaller differential in age is sufficient 2 make d critical difference @ speed & strength between equally weighed men of course .

    This is prime vs prime , so in this scenario McCallum doesn't have 2 b d older man by d full 10 yrs . However , MW McCallum was still significantly older than MW Eubanks and IDK if McCallum maybe somehow being stronger than Watson implies that he'd have also been stronger than Eubanks .

    It is a vast exaggeration 2 claim that Eubanks was a big lightheavy . Maybe in Tommy Loughran's era's standards he was , but in his era he was what he was , a massive middleweight and later a fully fledged supermiddleweight . As "cruiserweights" both McCallum and Eubanks just didn't bother 2 "cut weight" d way they did @ lower weights . It was their "heavyweight" , where ppl don't dehydrate , crash diet (usually) , enema , blood donating and **** .

    Eubanks was naturally more massive than McCallum was , but something like 10 lbs heavier , give or take 2 lbs .
     
  13. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,107
    15,591
    Dec 20, 2006
    Eubanks is very under appreciated and seems to find very little love here on ESB classic. Not sure if it is his personality or style or both? Benn who I find to be a lesser fighter finds much more acceptance here....
     
  14. Box-Fan

    Box-Fan Active Member Full Member

    771
    27
    May 31, 2012
    :patsch As soon as i saw the one vote for Eubank by KO/TKO why did i have a feeling it would be you atberry Eubank wouldn't knock McCallum out in a million years! Not even Roy Jones could stop a shot McCallum for gawds sake.
     
  15. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,107
    15,591
    Dec 20, 2006
    You have been here for a whole month and you know who picked a Eubank KO? While I don't think Eubank KO is the likely outcome, not all of us ascribe to the RJJ is God theory!