Who's record/resume would you prefer to have, Floyds or Mannys?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ThereIsOnlyOne, Jun 30, 2012.


  1. whirlwind

    whirlwind Active Member Full Member

    516
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    When you said Pac lost to Bradley. You mean Bradley won because Pac almost crippled him, broke his 2 legs and put him in a wheelchair?
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    It's still on Pac's resume as a loss, it is what it is man. I wouldn't want that fight on my record with that controversy attached.
     
  3. SweetScience

    SweetScience Accuracy is the key! Full Member

    3,403
    5
    Mar 25, 2007
    Anyone who is going with Pac's resume over past prime opponents must log off right now. Barrera 1 and Morales 1 were alright but fighting Barrera the 2nd time and fighting an old Mosley and fighters who are coming of losses puts a question mark on his resume.
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Chavez Sr?
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Manny resume is so much better. Manny's resume reminds me of Hagler,Hearns,Duran,Leonard. Floyd's resume does not.
     
  6. leone25

    leone25 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,605
    4
    Aug 13, 2010
    Id rather be ko'd twice than to be treated a coward and a criminal in my own country :lol:
     
  7. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
  8. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    :rofl
     
  9. GrizzyBeard

    GrizzyBeard Guest

    Ortiz sucks balls. What a shitty shitty win.
     
  10. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Yet that ortiz went up to WW and beat the **** out of berto. If pac was to have faced a prime berto at WW, would you guys have called it a shitty win? :think

    Also ortiz got a draw with peterson, a guy who went toe to toe with Amir Khan and got a win. So are we saying if floyd beat Khan that to would be a shitty win? :think
     
  11. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    sometimes what's telling is who he does not have or when he had them.

    on closer look gap is still farther than what his brigade are trying to make it seem.
     
  12. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    What is also telling is who you got beat by. :yep

    Pac not only got beat by good fighters, i.e morales and Marquez. He also got beat by ****ing bums

    **** out of here with your bull****, *******s can pretend all they want floyd resume shits on pac's.
     
  13. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    it would be safe to say that out of 51 boxing writers 48 would disagree with you.
     
  14. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Floyd's resume has a great exterior that the "0" in the loss column highlights but even though Floyd has a very solid resume, it doesn't match his great talent or skills. Many's resume has more depth and substance that solidifies his resume as being genuinely great. Rocky Marciano was undefeated like Floyd but if I had to choose who had a better resume between Rock and Joe Louis you know I'm going with Joe.
     
  15. GrizzyBeard

    GrizzyBeard Guest

    Berto sucks balls to...

    Ortiz will forever be Maidanas *****. No heart. None.

    The Cotto win is a great win for Mayweather but the Ortiz win is ****. Its as **** as Pacs w over Clottey, especially with Ortiz performance in his next fight. Id be saying the same about Berto, neither had earned the right to be in the ring with Mayweather and it was just going to be a dominant victory either way.