He's already beating the best at 41, but could he do it to 50 if he really tried? I think instead of outboxing and dominating everyone like he does now he'd probably have closer fights with him losing more than 3 rounds but still winning the fights with a possible split decision along the way. He'd still win at 50, he just wouldn't dominate the entire bout.
If he fought Chisora in Vegas he would have lost by a split decision. If he fails to knockout Helenius in Finland he could lose a decision. But if he stays in Germany.....:think
He's slipping at the moment, he hasn't looked great in his past few fights. I reckon another 2-3 fights and he'll be retired.
No, he's looking worn. I think Haye would beat him now. If a slow fat **** like Chisora can get in close Haye will too but with faster and harder shots. Vitali doesn't deserve to lose at this age I think he should retire. Still think I want Haye to fight him and win though.
If David Haye **** up Vitali, the forums will explode. I already got my reasoning lined up. Wlad beat a PRE PRIME David Haye
The merit of that comment though is somewhere along the lines of saying, yeh but he didn't beat a prime Mike Tyson. It's just completely irrelevant.