If you think Pac vs Bradley decision was bad

Your assuming he had any credibility to begin with? :huh

:rofl

 

yeah...that means the world to me. without my e-cred...i have no reason to live. gtfo!

 

Lol this is something most guys will agree with.

Arrogance is necessary otherwise he might as well never go for a title again, because without believing he is the best he admits he is a paper champion, which he is far from.

 

Froch could do the opposite, and lack the confidence to handle pressured situations? Remind you of anyone...

This content is protected

 

confidence...yes. arrogance? no.

he knows he got a gift against dirrell.

even with all of dirrells flopping....and froch's flagrant hitting on the break...hitting behind the head....etc....i still thought he won that fight very clearly.

 

so the guy cried because he was fouled flagrantly. he was beating
AA pretty easily until arthur hit him while he was down. kind of says something about european fighters having to foul to have "success" doesn't it?

 

Some of the best, I ment fighters Americans have labelled as world class have faced and been beaten by Carl, so having him as average is ridiculous.

Froch can't be behind Dirrell.
1. Froch SD12 Dirrell. Froch > Dirrell
2. Since the fight Dirrell has fought AA and a poor quality opponent, Froch has beat AA, Johnson and Bute had a very close fight with Kessler and lost convincingly to Ward. Froch > Dirrell

Find a FACT and not your opinion to suggest Dirrell > Froch.

 

you should know by now that if an american loses in a close fight they say he was robbed. then it moves on to "he dominated the fight".

morons are morons. anybody that can defend what dirrlell did that night has no class what so ever. he lost, live with it.

 

you should give up on trying to score fights. you're really bad at it.

 

his skills are average. favorable match making, gift decisions and cheating aside...he's a determined guy. maybe that makes him a little better than average.

split decision in nottingham = win for dirrell....gift for froch

please point me to the rounds that froch won.

dirrell was flagrantly fouled by AA and had medical issues as a result which have forced him to be sidelined. he was beating him very easily prior to the foul.

what i know about froch:

he's slow.

he can't cut off a ring.

he blocks punches with his face.

he's not that big of a puncher.

he needs to avenge that loss/gift.

 

:rofl Agenda time again? Now it's not just Brits, but the rest of Europe too who can't touch your precious Americans?


Dirrell vs Froch :


Whenever Froch makes the fight rough, Dirrell flops to the floor. There are seven or eight instances during the fight which mark this as a fact.



Dirrell vs Abraham :

First half of the fight = Dirrell winning easily. He's scoring at will, and out manouvering the German. Dirrell is fully of swagger and confidence. Even scoring a knockdown. (Nobody who's seen the fight will disupute this as being another fact.)

Second half of the fight = Abraham makes an adjustment, he shortens up the distance, and creates angles for himself by cutting the ring off. He starts to land a little more on Dirrell. Scoring a debatable KD which is ruled a trip by the ref. Dirrell all of a sudden begins to fall to the floor when Abraham gets close. A repeat of the Froch fight, marking this as a habbit rather than a one off. The fight gets rough, Dirrell looks for breaks and rest periods. He does this 4 or 5 times which leads to the oppertunity for Abraham's DQ. Again, this is pretty much a fact.


Yeah, Dirrell is all heart. :roll:

 

seriously....

let's do a round by round break down.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Yeah, what a cherrypicker that Carl Froch is...

 

many people in america thought carl had won the fight. ring mag was one of them.

 

I think Dirrell won but I think you're trolling a little hard now.

Just because you got one gift decision doesn't make you "average" come on I don't even like Froch as a person but dude is good and always gives his best.

Some credit please.