Would You Rather Be a Skilled Boxing Historian or Analyst?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slickstar, Jul 5, 2012.

  1. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    7,094
    Likes Received:
    5
    :think
     
  2. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    13,207
    Likes Received:
    11
    If by skilled you mean, thinks everyone born post 1964 is ****. Then I'd rather be a successful boxer turned analyst.
     
  3. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,826
    Likes Received:
    105
    ya got the best hybrid in the sport on ESB, S89 (Springs Toledo)
     
  4. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    20,873
    Likes Received:
    647
    rather be a skilled boxer. without whooping coughed lungs
     
  5. wordisbond

    wordisbond Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    17
    I'm gonna go with analyst because it would be easier to get steady pay that way. I'm sure you can make money putting out books a la Burt Sugar, but I would love to cover fights for a living and make a decent career out of it.
     
  6. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,382
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I think Analyst. By having the tools to dissect, I can unlock new understandings from today, yesterday, and predicting tomorrow. With history, I can learn a great deal, but it doesn't mean I'll know exactly what I'm seeing. But surely the two are related.
     
  7. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,138
    Likes Received:
    1
    Analyst. Meaning you'd be current and relevant with the sport and people today.
     
  8. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    12,240
    Likes Received:
    15
    i'm both.
     
  9. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    12,826
    Likes Received:
    3
    why not both?
     
  10. Phanekim

    Phanekim Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    8
    analyst./
     
  11. Slickstar

    Slickstar Crisp This Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    7,094
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm not saying it's impossible, but many people on the general section of the forum tend to strongly lean towards one or the other.
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    9,461
    Likes Received:
    350
    analyst...alot of historians are plain crazy.
     
  13. bballchamp11

    bballchamp11 Poster of the Year Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    easy question. It's like asking if you rather be a sjs19 or Leon vs a popkins?
     
  14. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,463
    Likes Received:
    1
    :lol:
     
  15. Jacquot

    Jacquot Cruiserweight Paper Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    510
    Likes Received:
    4
    I'm a historian. My analysis skills when it comes to boxing kind of suck. I'd rather just be honest about it and stick to observing the current and studying the past.