"froch lost 11.5 rounds against taylor"

Wrong. He was coming strong in the late rounds, even though Taylor was slightly ahead in the last round. IMO, of course.

 

Who said it Phil?

 

Delusional uneducated Pavlik fans: styles make fights.

 

you should have made the poll public, one ****** has voted already

 

It was competitive fight, but Taylor was winning

 

irrelevant

 

Complete myth. The fight was close on the cards and a long way away from a shutout.

 

Even if he did lose 11.5 rounds, it don't mean ****. Taylor was another punch or 2 from eating the canvas and Froch won fair and square. It was close, with Taylor ahead by 2 or 3 rounds.

 

I think i may have had taylor a point ahead going into the last round

 

I suspected that was the angle.
Whatever gets them through the cold,lonely alcohol-free nights.:roll:

 

he coming on stronger every round from the 6th onwards.
BY the late rounds Taylor was just trying to pot shot and get some air....
Froch wouldnt let him and Taylor folded like a pack of cards

 

A lot of Froch detractors (who have seemingly gone all quiet since the Bute fight) like Bailey - the ****ing spastic mong who should be stoned to death - use the ''Froch lost every round against Taylor'' to take away from the victory.

In that case Leonard's win over Hearns means **** all, or Chavez over Taylor.